Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Nov 4, 2020
Date Accepted: Jun 19, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Feasibility of Real-time Behavior Monitoring Via Mobile Technology in Czech Adults Aged 50 Years and Above: 12-Week Study With Ecological Momentary Assessment

Elavsky S

Feasibility of Real-time Behavior Monitoring Via Mobile Technology in Czech Adults Aged 50 Years and Above: 12-Week Study With Ecological Momentary Assessment

JMIR Aging 2021;4(4):e15220

DOI: 10.2196/15220

PMID: 34757317

PMCID: 8663589

Feasibility of Real-Time Behavior Monitoring via Mobile Technology in Czech Adults 50+: A 12-Week Study with Ecological Momentary Assessment

  • Steriani Elavsky

ABSTRACT

Background:

Czech older adults have lower rates of physical activity than the population average and lag behind in the use of digital technologies even when compared to their peers from other European countries.

Objective:

The study objective was to assess the feasibility of intensive behavior monitoring through technology in Czech adults aged 50 years and older.

Methods:

Participants (N=30, M age = 61.2, SD = 6.8, range 50-74, 53% male, 23% retired) were monitored for 12 weeks while wearing a Fitbit Charge 2 monitor and completed three 8 day bursts of intensive data collection through surveys presented on a custom-made mobile app. Online surveys were also completed before and at the end of the 12-week period (along with post-study focus groups) to evaluate participant perceptions of their experience in the study.

Results:

All 30 participants completed the study. Across the three 8-day bursts, participants completed 1454 out of 1744 surveys administered three times per day at a pseudo-random schedule (83% compliance rate), 451 out of 559 end-of-day surveys (81% compliance rate), and additionally self-reported 736 episodes of planned physical activity (with 4% of the reports initiated but returned without data). Overall rating of using the mobile app and Fitbit was above average (74.5 out of 100 on the System Usability Scale). The majority reported the Fitbit (90%) and the application (84%) were easy to use and rated their experience positively (83%). Focus groups revealed that some surveys were missed due to notifications not being noticed or that participants would need a longer time window for survey completion. Some found wearing of the monitor in hot weather or at night uncomfortable, but overall participants were highly motivated to complete the surveys and to be compliant with the study procedures.

Conclusions:

The use of a mobile survey app coupled with a wearable device appears feasible for use with Czech older adults. Participants in this study tolerated the intensive assessment schedule well but lower compliance may be expected in studies of more diverse groups of older adults. Some difficulty was noted with pairing and synchronization of devices with some types of smartphones, posing challenges for large-scale studies.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Elavsky S

Feasibility of Real-time Behavior Monitoring Via Mobile Technology in Czech Adults Aged 50 Years and Above: 12-Week Study With Ecological Momentary Assessment

JMIR Aging 2021;4(4):e15220

DOI: 10.2196/15220

PMID: 34757317

PMCID: 8663589

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.