Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Jun 12, 2019
Date Accepted: Feb 2, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

A Lower Leg Physical Activity Intervention for Individuals With Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers: Randomized Controlled Trial

Kelechi TJ, Prentice MA, Mueller M, Madisetti M, Vertegel A

A Lower Leg Physical Activity Intervention for Individuals With Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers: Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(5):e15015

DOI: 10.2196/15015

PMID: 32412419

PMCID: 7260657

A mHealth Lower Leg Physical Activity Intervention for Individuals with Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers: Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Teresa Jane Kelechi; 
  • Margaret Anne Prentice; 
  • Martina Mueller; 
  • Mohan Madisetti; 
  • Alexey Vertegel

ABSTRACT

Background:

Individuals with venous leg ulcers (VLUs) suffer disproportionally with multiple chronic conditions, are often physically de-conditioned and demonstrate high levels of physical inactivity.

Objective:

The primary objective was to establish the feasibility of a mobile health (mHealth) smartphone physical activity exercise application (app) for individuals with VLUs to improve lower leg function.

Methods:

In a 6-week pilot randomized controlled trial 24 adults with VLUs were recruited from two wound centers in South Carolina, USA and enrolled if they were 18 years of age or older with impaired functional mobility, and ankle brachial index (ABI) between 0.8-1.3. Participants were randomized 1:1 to either the control or intervention group. The mHealth app delivered daily evidence-based, phased, non-exertive physical conditioning activities for lower leg function to both groups, and provided automated educational/motivational messages and user reports. Foot movement on the affected leg was tracked by a Bluetooth enabled tri-axial accelerometer. Participants in the intervention group were additionally provided with the ability to communicate directly with their clinician, who was in turn able to monitor patient adherence and provide feedback. The study was guided by the RE-AIM framework to assess feasibility of reach, adherence, acceptability, implementation and maintenance. In a secondary aim, clinical outcomes were assessed for physical and mental function, foot strength, ankle range of motion, walking and depression.

Results:

Participants reported difficulty following the protocol for exercising, using the accelerometer and Smartphone, and did not use the provider contact feature. Providers were inconsistent in checking participant progress reports due to lack of time from competing work commitments. The technology became outdated quickly, making maintenance problematic. Participants said they would continue to exercise their foot and legs and liked being able to follow along with demonstrations of each level of exercise. The 5° increase benchmark set for range of motion was not achieved except for dorsiflexion of the left ankle (6.5° ± 11.7 over baseline, 95% CI, -14.8; 1.9) in the FOOTFIT group. There were no clinically meaningful changes noted in strength anticipated to improve by 10 lb/in2 for dorsiflexion and plantar flexion except for the right ankle (5.2 ± 7.4, 95% CI, 0.2; 10.2) in the FOOTFIT group. No other clinically relevant changes were noted for function, walking distance, depression or mental and physical health.

Conclusions:

Findings suggest that despite initial interest for using the app, several components of the program as originally designed had limited acceptability and feasibility. Future refinements should include the use of more modern technology including smaller wearable accelerometers, smartphones or tablets with larger screens, an app designed with larger graphics, automated reporting for providers, and more engaging user features. The study should be conducted over 12-weeks to allow for adequate time to measure intervention effects. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov: NTC02632695; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02632695?term=physical+activity+leg+ulcer&rank=1


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kelechi TJ, Prentice MA, Mueller M, Madisetti M, Vertegel A

A Lower Leg Physical Activity Intervention for Individuals With Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers: Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(5):e15015

DOI: 10.2196/15015

PMID: 32412419

PMCID: 7260657

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.