Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: May 12, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: May 13, 2019 - Jul 8, 2019
Date Accepted: Aug 12, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Perception of the Progressing Digitization and Transformation of the German Health Care System Among Experts and the Public: Mixed Methods Study

Hansen A, Herrmann M, Ehlers JP, Mondritzki T, Truebel H, Böhme P

Perception of the Progressing Digitization and Transformation of the German Health Care System Among Experts and the Public: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2019;5(4):e14689

DOI: 10.2196/14689

PMID: 31661082

PMCID: 6913772

Transformation of the German Health Care System – Perception of the Progressing Digitization among Experts and the Public: A Mixed Method Study

  • Arne Hansen; 
  • Maximilian Herrmann; 
  • Jan P Ehlers; 
  • Thomas Mondritzki; 
  • Hubert Truebel; 
  • Philip Böhme

ABSTRACT

Background:

Health care systems worldwide are struggling to keep rising costs at bay with only modest outcome improvement among many diseases. Digitization with technologies like Artificial Intelligence or Machine Learning algorithms might address this. Although digital technologies have been successfully applied in clinical studies the effect on the overall health care system so far was limited. The regulatory ecosystem or data privacy might be responsible, but other reasons may also predominate.

Objective:

We analyzed how the digitization of the German health care market is currently perceived among different stakeholders and investigated reasons for its slow adaption.

Methods:

A Mixed Method study split into a qualitative Part A using the conceptual approach of the Grounded Theory and a quantitative Part B using the Delphi method was conducted. For Part A we interviewed experts in the health care system and converted the results into 17 hypotheses. The Delphi method consisted of an online survey, which was sent to the participants via e-mail and was available for three months. For the assessment of the 17 hypotheses, the participants were given a six-point Likert scale. The participants were grouped into patients, physicians, and providers of services within the German health care market.

Results:

There was a strong alignment of the hypotheses between experts (N=21) and survey participants together (N=733) with overall 70.5% agreement on 12 out of the 17 hypotheses. Physicians demonstrated the lowest level of agreement with the expert panel in 88% (15/17). Especially the hypotheses “H8: Digitization in the health care system will free up jobs” and “H6: Digitization in the health care system will empower the patients” were perceived to be in profound disagreement between physicians and the experts (P < .05 and P < .001, respectively).

Conclusions:

Despite the firm agreement among participants and experts regarding the impact of the digitization on the health care system, especially physicians demonstrated a more negative attitude. We assume that this might be a factor contributing to the slow adoption of digitization in practice. Physicians might struggle with changing power structures and therefore future measures to transform the market should involve them to a larger degree.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Hansen A, Herrmann M, Ehlers JP, Mondritzki T, Truebel H, Böhme P

Perception of the Progressing Digitization and Transformation of the German Health Care System Among Experts and the Public: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2019;5(4):e14689

DOI: 10.2196/14689

PMID: 31661082

PMCID: 6913772

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.