Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: May 2, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: May 2, 2019 - May 10, 2019
Date Accepted: Jul 19, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Objective User Engagement With Mental Health Apps: Systematic Search and Panel-Based Usage Analysis

Baumel A, Muench F, Edan S, Kane JM

Objective User Engagement With Mental Health Apps: Systematic Search and Panel-Based Usage Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(9):e14567

DOI: 10.2196/14567

PMID: 31573916

PMCID: 6785720

Benchmarks of Real-World Objective User Engagement with Mental Health Apps

  • Amit Baumel; 
  • Fred Muench; 
  • Stav Edan; 
  • John M. Kane

ABSTRACT

Background:

Understanding patterns of real-world usage of mental health apps is key to maximizing apps’ potential to increase the public self-management of care. While developer-led studies have published results on the utilization of mental health apps deployed in real-world settings, to the best of our knowledge, no study has systematically examined usage patterns of a large sample of mental health apps relying on independently collected data.

Objective:

To present real-world objective data on user engagement with popular mental health apps.

Methods:

A systematic engine search was conducted using Google Play to identify Android apps with 10,000 installs or more, targeting anxiety, depression, or emotional well-being. Coding of apps included primary incorporated techniques and clinical focus. Behavioral data on real-world usage were obtained from a panel that provides aggregated non-personal information on user engagement with mobile apps.

Results:

Altogether 93 apps met the inclusion criteria (median number of installs = 100,000). The median percentage of daily active users (open rate) was 4.0% with a difference found between trackers (median = 6.3%) and peer-support apps (median=17.0%) in comparison to breathing exercise apps (median = 1.6%; Zs ≥ 3.42, Ps < .001). Among active users, daily minutes of use were significantly higher for mindfulness/meditation (median = 21:28) and peer support (median = 35:05) apps than for apps incorporating other techniques (tracker, breathing exercise, psychoeducation; medians range = 03:32-08:19; Zs ≥ 2.11, Ps < .05). The medians of app 15-day and 30-day retention rates were 3.9% and 3.3%, respectively. On day 30, peer support (median = 8.9%), mindfulness/meditation (median = 4.7%), and tracker apps (median = 6.1%) had significantly higher retention rates than breathing exercise apps (median = 0.0%; Zs ≥ 2.18, Ps ≤ .035). The pattern of daily use presented a descriptive peak toward the evening for apps incorporating most techniques (tracker, psychoeducation, and peer-support) with the exception of mindfulness/meditation, which exhibited two peaks (morning and night).

Conclusions:

While the number of app installs and daily active minutes of use may seem high, only a small portion of users actually utilize the apps for a long period of time. More studies leveraging different datasets are needed to understand this phenomenon and to better conceptualize our understanding of the ways in which users self-manage their condition in real-world settings.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Baumel A, Muench F, Edan S, Kane JM

Objective User Engagement With Mental Health Apps: Systematic Search and Panel-Based Usage Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(9):e14567

DOI: 10.2196/14567

PMID: 31573916

PMCID: 6785720

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.