Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Apr 26, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 29, 2019 - Jun 24, 2019
Date Accepted: Nov 29, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

A Weekly, Evidence-Based Health Letter for Caregivers (90Second Caregiver): Usability Study

Milios A, McGrath P, Baillie H

A Weekly, Evidence-Based Health Letter for Caregivers (90Second Caregiver): Usability Study

JMIR Form Res 2020;4(2):e14496

DOI: 10.2196/14496

PMID: 32049064

PMCID: 7055838

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

A Weekly, Evidence-Based Health Letter for Caregivers (90Second Caregiver): Usability Study

  • Athena Milios; 
  • Patrick McGrath; 
  • Hannah Baillie

Background:

Informal caregivers are family members or close friends who provide unpaid help to individuals with acute or chronic health conditions so that they can manage daily life tasks. The greatest source of health information is the internet for meeting the needs of caregivers. However, information on the internet may not be scientifically valid, it may be written in language that is difficult to read, and is often in very large doses. 90Second Caregiver is a health letter whose aim is to disseminate knowledge to caregivers in a user-friendly, weekly format, in order to improve their wellbeing.

Objective:

The main objective was to test a sample of 90Second Caregiver health letters in order to assess their usability and to optimize the design and content of the health letters.

Methods:

Usability research themes were assessed using semi-structured phone interviews, incorporating the Think Aloud method with retrospective questioning.

Results:

Usability was assessed in the context of five main themes: understandability and learnability, completeness, relevance, and quality and credibility of the health letter content, as well as design and format. Caregivers generally provided positive feedback regarding the usability of the letters. The usability feedback was used to refine 90Second Caregiver in order to improve the design and content of the series. Based on the results of this study, it may be of maximum benefit to target the series towards individuals who are new to caregiving or part-time caregivers, given that these caregivers of the sample found the letters more useful and relevant and had the most positive usability experiences.

Conclusions:

The findings assisted in the improvement of the 90Second Caregiver template, which will be used to create future health letters and refine the letters that have already been created. The findings have implications for who the 90Second Caregiver series should be targeting (ie, newer or part-time caregivers) in order to be maximally impactful in improving mental health and wellbeing-related outcomes for caregivers, such as self-efficacy and caregiving knowledge. The results of this study may be generalizable to the examination of other electronic health information formats, making them valuable to future researchers testing the usability of health information products. In addition, the methods used in this study are useful for usability hypothesis generation. Lastly, our 90Second delivery approach can generate information useful for a set of similar products (eg, weekly health letters targeted towards other conditions/populations).


 Citation

Please cite as:

Milios A, McGrath P, Baillie H

A Weekly, Evidence-Based Health Letter for Caregivers (90Second Caregiver): Usability Study

JMIR Form Res 2020;4(2):e14496

DOI: 10.2196/14496

PMID: 32049064

PMCID: 7055838

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.