Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Apr 3, 2019
Date Accepted: Aug 18, 2019

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

An Interactive Parent-Targeted Text Messaging Intervention to Improve Oral Health in Children Attending Urban Pediatric Clinics: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial

Borrelli B, Henshaw M, Endrighi R, Adams WG, Heeren T, Rosen R, Bock B, Werntz S

An Interactive Parent-Targeted Text Messaging Intervention to Improve Oral Health in Children Attending Urban Pediatric Clinics: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019;7(11):e14247

DOI: 10.2196/14247

PMID: 31710306

PMCID: 6878100

Interactive Parent-targeted Text Messaging in Pediatric Clinics to Improve Oral Health Among Urban Children

  • Belinda Borrelli; 
  • Michelle Henshaw; 
  • Romano Endrighi; 
  • William G Adams; 
  • Timothy Heeren; 
  • Rochelle Rosen; 
  • Beth Bock; 
  • Scott Werntz

ABSTRACT

Background:

Over 95% of adults text-message (TM). Despite the fact that there are effective preventive treatments for dental decay, caries experience among pre-school aged children has remained relatively unchanged for two decades, with marked disparities in untreated decay and dental care access. There are no TM studies focusing on oral health for vulnerable children.

Objective:

This is a pilot randomized trial testing effects of oral health text messages (OHT) vs. control (child wellness text messages; CWT). OHT was hypothesized to outperform CWT on improving pediatric oral health behaviors and parent attitudes.

Methods:

Parents with a child <7 years were recruited at urban clinics during pediatric appointments (78.8%

Results:

Only one participant dropped-out during the TMs and n=47 completed the follow-up survey. TM response rates (74.2%) and program satisfaction (M=6.3; 1-7 scale) were high, with no significant group differences. 84% of OHT would recommend the program to others, and participants reported high perceived impact of the TMs on brushing their child’s teeth, motivation to address child's oral health, and knowledge of their child's oral health needs (M=4.7, M=4.6, M=4.6, respectively; 1-5 scales). At follow-up, compared to CWT, OHT was more likely to brush their children’s teeth twice per day (OR=1.37; 95% CI=0.28, 6.5), and improved their attitude regarding use of fluoride (OR=3.82; 95%CI=0.9-16.8;1) and towards getting regular dental check-ups for their child (OR = 4.68, 95% CI [.24, 91.4]). There were modest, not significant changes in motivation (p=0.45) and self-efficacy (p=0.63) to engage in oral health behaviors which tended to favor OHT (d=0.28 and 0.16 for motivation and self-efficacy respectively).

Conclusions:

The program demonstrated feasibility, was well-utilized and appealing to the target population, and shows promise for efficacy. Clinical Trial: This is a pilot trial and our funder (NIH) told us not to register.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Borrelli B, Henshaw M, Endrighi R, Adams WG, Heeren T, Rosen R, Bock B, Werntz S

An Interactive Parent-Targeted Text Messaging Intervention to Improve Oral Health in Children Attending Urban Pediatric Clinics: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019;7(11):e14247

DOI: 10.2196/14247

PMID: 31710306

PMCID: 6878100

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.