Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols
Date Submitted: Apr 1, 2019
Date Accepted: Jul 16, 2019
Comparing the impact of an implicit learning approach (ILA) to standard care, on recovery of mobility following stroke: protocol for a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial.
ABSTRACT
Background:
Whilst implicit and explicit learning approaches have been well investigated in healthy populations, there is less evidence regarding the relative benefits of each approach in clinical practice. Studies in stroke typically investigate single elements of an implicit learning approach (e.g. reduced quantity feedback or an external focus of attention), within controlled environments. These studies predominantly evaluate performance, with few measuring this over time (i.e. learning). The relevance and transferability of current research evidence into stroke rehabilitation is therefore unknown.
Objective:
To assess the feasibility of running a cluster randomised trial of an implicit learning approach (ILA) versus usual care for functional motor recovery in the acute phase following stroke.
Methods:
This is a multicentre, assessor blind, cluster randomised controlled pilot trial, with nested qualitative evaluation. Stroke Units (clusters) will be randomised to either ILA (intervention), or standard care (control) arms. Therapy teams at the intervention sites will be trained in the ILA and provided with an intervention manual. Those at the control sites will have minimal input from the research team, other than for data collection. Consent will take place at the individual participant level. Once enrolled, participants will receive all rehabilitation that focusses on lower limb recovery, using the designated approach. Measures will be taken at baseline, every two weeks until the point of discharge from hospital, and at three months post stroke onset. Measures include the Fugl Meyer Assessment (motor leg sub-section), modified Rivermead Mobility Index, Swedish Postural Adjustment in Stroke Scale, and achievement of mobility milestones. Fidelity of the treatment approach will be monitored using observational video analysis. Parameters relating to the overall design will be estimated, and used to inform a future trial (e.g. recruitment and retention). Focus groups and interviews will be used to gain insight into the perceptions of trial participants, and clinical teams.
Results:
The first site opened to recruitment in February 2019. Opening of a further 5 sites will be staggered throughout 2019.
Conclusions:
The findings from this mixed methods pilot study will be used to inform the design of a definitive study, comparing the ILA to standard care in acute stroke rehabilitation. ts are expected in early 2021. Clinical Trial: The study has been approved by the Berkshire Research Ethics Committee B [18/SC/0582]. Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT03792126]
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.