Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: May 28, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: May 31, 2019 - Jun 14, 2019
Date Accepted: Oct 29, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Examining the Ethical Implications of Health Care Technology Described in US and Swedish PhD Dissertations: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Nygren JM, De Ruiter HP

Examining the Ethical Implications of Health Care Technology Described in US and Swedish PhD Dissertations: Protocol for a Scoping Review

JMIR Res Protoc 2020;9(1):e14157

DOI: 10.2196/14157

PMID: 32012096

PMCID: 7003119

Examining the Ethical Implications of Healthcare Technology Described in US and Swedish PhD Dissertations: A Scoping Review Protocol

  • Jens M. Nygren; 
  • Hans-Peter De Ruiter

ABSTRACT

Background:

The development of new biomedical technologies is accelerating at an unprecedented speed. These new technologies will undoubtedly bring solutions to long-standing problems and health conditions. However, they will likely also have a shadow side in the form of unintended effects or ethical implications accompanying them. It may be presumed that the research behind new technologies has been evaluated from an ethical perspective; however, the evidence that this has been done is scant.

Objective:

The objective of this study is to gain an understanding, if and how PhD dissertations focused on health technologies describe actual or possible ethical issues resulting from their research.

Methods:

The purpose of scoping reviews is to map a topic in the literature comprehensively and systematically to identify gaps in the literature or identify key evidence. The search strategy for this protocol will include electronic databases including ProQuest, Medline/Pubmed, Diva, SwePub and LIBRIS. Searches will be limited to PhD dissertations published in the US and Sweden in the last ten years. The study will be mapped in five stages: 1) identifying the research question, 2) identifying relevant studies, 3) study selection, 4) retrieving and charting the data, and 5) collating, summarizing and reporting the results.

Results:

The findings of this study will indicate if and how researchers, PhD students and their supervisors, are considering ethics in their studies, including both research ethics and the ethical implications of their work. The findings can guide researchers in determining gaps and shortcomings in current doctoral education and offer a foundation to adjusting doctoral research education.

Conclusions:

In a society where technology and research are advancing at speeds unknown to us before, we need to find new and more efficient ways to consider ethical issues and address them in a timelier manner. This study will offer an understanding of how ethics is currently being integrated into US and Swedish PhD dissertations and inform the future direction of ethics education at a doctoral level.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Nygren JM, De Ruiter HP

Examining the Ethical Implications of Health Care Technology Described in US and Swedish PhD Dissertations: Protocol for a Scoping Review

JMIR Res Protoc 2020;9(1):e14157

DOI: 10.2196/14157

PMID: 32012096

PMCID: 7003119

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.