Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Apr 30, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: May 3, 2019 - Jun 28, 2019
Date Accepted: Aug 19, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Antismoking Advertisements and Price Promotions and Their Association With the Urge to Smoke and Purchases in a Virtual Convenience Store: Randomized Experiment

Dutra L, Nonnemaker J, Bradfield B, Taylor N, Guillory J, Feld A, Kim A

Antismoking Advertisements and Price Promotions and Their Association With the Urge to Smoke and Purchases in a Virtual Convenience Store: Randomized Experiment

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(10):e14143

DOI: 10.2196/14143

PMID: 31647468

PMCID: 6914233

Anti-smoking ads, price promotions, urges to smoke, and purchases in a virtual convenience store

  • Lauren Dutra; 
  • James Nonnemaker; 
  • Brian Bradfield; 
  • Nathaniel Taylor; 
  • Jamie Guillory; 
  • Ashley Feld; 
  • Annice Kim

ABSTRACT

Background:

Point of sale (POS) advertising is associated with smoking initiation, current smoking, and relapse among former smokers. Price promotion bans and anti-smoking advertisements (anti-ads) are too possible interventions for combatting these influences.

Objective:

The purpose of this analysis was to determine the relationship between anti- ads and price promotions (promos) and urges to smoke and tobacco purchases.

Methods:

This analysis examined exposure to graphic and supportive anti-ads and promos in a virtual convenience store as predictors of urge to smoke and buying tobacco products among 1,200 current cigarette smokers and 800 recent quitters recruited via an online panel. We used STATA to construct linear regression models for urge to smoke and logistic regression models for tobacco purchases, stratified by smoking status.

Results:

The only significant finding was a significant negative relationship between exposure to supportive anti-ads and urge to smoke among current smokers (Coeff = -5.04, 95%CI: -9.85, -0.22). All other analysis of anti-ads, promos, urges to smoke, and tobacco purchases were not significant for either current smokers or recent quitters at the P >0.05 significance level.

Conclusions:

The results of this analysis support the potential utility of supportive anti-ads at the POS to influence urge to smoke among current cigarette smokers.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Dutra L, Nonnemaker J, Bradfield B, Taylor N, Guillory J, Feld A, Kim A

Antismoking Advertisements and Price Promotions and Their Association With the Urge to Smoke and Purchases in a Virtual Convenience Store: Randomized Experiment

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(10):e14143

DOI: 10.2196/14143

PMID: 31647468

PMCID: 6914233

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.