JMIR Publications

ABSTRACT

Background:

Connected Health (CH) technologies have resulted in a paradigm shift moving healthcare steadily towards a more patient-centered delivery approach. CH requires a broad range of disciplinary expertise from across the spectrum working in a cohesive and productive way. Building this interdisciplinary relationship at an earlier stage of career development may nurture and accelerate the CH developments and innovations required for future healthcare.

Objective:

This study explored the perceptions of interdisciplinary CH researchers regarding the design and delivery of an interdisciplinary education module for disciplines currently engaged in CH research (engineers, computer scientists, healthcare practitioners, policymakers). It was considered whether this module should be delivered as a taught component of either an undergraduate, masters or doctoral program in order to facilitate the development of interdisciplinary learning.

Methods:

A qualitative, cross-institutional, multi-stage research approach was adopted which involved a background study of the fundamental concepts, individual interviews with CH researchers in Greece (n=9) and two structured group feedback sessions with CH researchers in Ireland (n=10/16). Thematic analysis was used to identify the themes emerging from the interviews and structured group feedback sessions.

Results:

Two sets of findings emerged from the data. In the first instance challenges to interdisciplinary working were identified including communication challenges, divergent awareness of state-of-the-art CH technologies across disciplines, and a cultural resistance to interdisciplinarity. The second set of findings related to design for interdisciplinarity. In this regard the need to link research and education with real-world practice emerged as a key design concern. Positioning within the program context was also considered to be important with a need to balance early intervention to embed integration with later repeat interventions that maximize opportunities to share skills and experiences.

Conclusions:

The authors raise and address challenges to interdisciplinary program design for CH based on an abductive approach combining interdisciplinary and interprofessional education literatures and the collection of qualitative data. This recipe for interdisciplinary design offers guidelines for policy makers, educators and innovators in the CH space. Gaining insight from CH researchers regarding the development of an interdisciplinary education module has offered the designers a novel insight regarding the curriculum, the timing, the delivery and potential challenges which may be encountered.