Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health
Date Submitted: Mar 8, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 12, 2019 - Apr 23, 2019
Date Accepted: May 30, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Predicting Risk of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptomology Using Machine Learning
ABSTRACT
Background:
The majority of adults in the US will be exposed to a potentially traumatic event, but only a handful will go on to develop impairing mental health conditions such as Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).
Objective:
Identifying those at elevated risk shortly after trauma exposure is a clinical challenge. We aim to develop computational methods to more effectively identify at-risk patients, and thereby support better early interventions.
Methods:
We propose machine learning (ML) induction of models to automatically predict elevated PTSD symptoms in patients one month after a trauma, using self-reported symptoms from data collected via smartphones.
Results:
We show that an ensemble model accurately predicts elevated PTSD symptoms, with an AUC of 0.85, using a bag of SVM, Naïve Bayes, logistic regression, and random forest algorithms. Furthermore, we show that only 7 self-report items (features) are needed to obtain this AUC. Most importantly, we show that accurate predictions can be made after 10-20 days post trauma.
Conclusions:
These results suggest that simple smartphone-based patient surveys, coupled with automated analysis using ML-trained models, can identify those at risk for developing elevated PTSD symptoms and thus target them for early intervention.
Citation

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.