Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.
Who will be affected?
Readers: No access to all 28 journals. We recommend accessing our articles via PubMed Central
Authors: No access to the submission form or your user account.
Reviewers: No access to your user account. Please download manuscripts you are reviewing for offline reading before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Editors: No access to your user account to assign reviewers or make decisions.
Copyeditors: No access to user account. Please download manuscripts you are copyediting before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Divakar U, Nazeha N, Posadzki P, Järbrink K, Bajpai R, Ho AHY, Campbell J, Feder G, Car J
Digital Education of Health Professionals on the Management of Domestic Violence: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration
Digital education of health professionals on the management of domestic violence: Systematic review and meta-analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration
Ushashree Divakar;
Nuraini Nazeha;
Pawel Posadzki;
Krister Järbrink;
Ram Bajpai;
Andy Hau Yan Ho;
James Campbell;
Gene Feder;
Josip Car
ABSTRACT
Background:
According to the World Health Organization (WHO) 35% of women experience domestic violence at least once during their lifetimes. Yet approximately 80% of healthcare professionals have never received any training on management of this major public health concern.
Objective:
The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of health professions’ digital education on domestic violence.
Methods:
Seven electronic databases were searched for RCTs from January 1990 to August 2017.
Results:
Six studies with 631 participants met our inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of five studies showed that when compared with controls digital education may improve knowledge (Standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.67, 95% Confidence intervals (CI) 0.38 to 0.95; participants = 510; I2 = 59% low certainty evidence); as well as attitudes (SMD 0.67, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.09; participants = 339; studies = 3; I2 = 68%; low certainty evidence); and probably improves self-efficacy (SMD 0.47, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.77; participants = 174; studies = 3; I2 = 0%; moderate certainty evidence).
Conclusions:
The evidence on the effectiveness of digital education on health professionals’ understanding of domestic violence is promising. However, the certainty of the evidence is predominantly low and merits further research. Given the opportunity of scaled transformative digital education both further research and implementation within evaluative context should be prioritised.
Citation
Please cite as:
Divakar U, Nazeha N, Posadzki P, Järbrink K, Bajpai R, Ho AHY, Campbell J, Feder G, Car J
Digital Education of Health Professionals on the Management of Domestic Violence: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration