Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Mar 2, 2019
Date Accepted: May 1, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Digital Education of Health Professionals on the Management of Domestic Violence: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration

Divakar U, Nazeha N, Posadzki P, Järbrink K, Bajpai R, Ho AHY, Campbell J, Feder G, Car J

Digital Education of Health Professionals on the Management of Domestic Violence: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(5):e13868

DOI: 10.2196/13868

PMID: 31124462

PMCID: 6552406

Digital education of health professionals on the management of domestic violence: Systematic review and meta-analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration

  • Ushashree Divakar; 
  • Nuraini Nazeha; 
  • Pawel Posadzki; 
  • Krister Järbrink; 
  • Ram Bajpai; 
  • Andy Hau Yan Ho; 
  • James Campbell; 
  • Gene Feder; 
  • Josip Car

ABSTRACT

Background:

According to the World Health Organization (WHO) 35% of women experience domestic violence at least once during their lifetimes. Yet approximately 80% of healthcare professionals have never received any training on management of this major public health concern.

Objective:

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of health professions’ digital education on domestic violence.

Methods:

Seven electronic databases were searched for RCTs from January 1990 to August 2017.

Results:

Six studies with 631 participants met our inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of five studies showed that when compared with controls digital education may improve knowledge (Standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.67, 95% Confidence intervals (CI) 0.38 to 0.95; participants = 510; I2 = 59% low certainty evidence); as well as attitudes (SMD 0.67, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.09; participants = 339; studies = 3; I2 = 68%; low certainty evidence); and probably improves self-efficacy (SMD 0.47, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.77; participants = 174; studies = 3; I2 = 0%; moderate certainty evidence).

Conclusions:

The evidence on the effectiveness of digital education on health professionals’ understanding of domestic violence is promising. However, the certainty of the evidence is predominantly low and merits further research. Given the opportunity of scaled transformative digital education both further research and implementation within evaluative context should be prioritised.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Divakar U, Nazeha N, Posadzki P, Järbrink K, Bajpai R, Ho AHY, Campbell J, Feder G, Car J

Digital Education of Health Professionals on the Management of Domestic Violence: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(5):e13868

DOI: 10.2196/13868

PMID: 31124462

PMCID: 6552406

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.