Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.
Who will be affected?
Readers: No access to all 28 journals. We recommend accessing our articles via PubMed Central
Authors: No access to the submission form or your user account.
Reviewers: No access to your user account. Please download manuscripts you are reviewing for offline reading before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Editors: No access to your user account to assign reviewers or make decisions.
Copyeditors: No access to user account. Please download manuscripts you are copyediting before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
The Applicability of a Patient Decision Aid in App-Format for Patients
with Chronic Kidney Disease illuminated with pre - and post interventions questionnaire
Signe Bülow Therkildsen;
Linda Houlind Hansen;
Laura Emilie Dinesen Jensen;
Jeanette Finderup
ABSTRACT
Background:
The Dialysis Guide (DG) is a patient decision aid (PDA) in app format developed for smartphones for patients with chronic kidney disease facing the decision about dialysis modality.
Objective:
To uncover the applicability of the DG as a PDA.
Methods:
The respondents completed a questionnaire before and after using the DG. The respondents' decisional conflicts were examined using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), and the usability was examined using the System Usability Scale (SUS). The change in decisional conflict was determined with a paired t-test.
Results:
22 respondents participated and the mean age was 65.05 years; 20 out of 22 (90%) had attended a patient school for kidney disease, and 13 out of 22 (59%) had participated in a conversation about dialysis choice with a health professional. After using the DG, the respondents' decisional conflicts were reduced, though not statistically significantly (P=.49). The mean value (SD) of the SUS score was 66.82 (14.54), corresponding to low usability.
Conclusions:
The DG does not significantly reduce the decisional conflict, though the results indicate that it helped the respondents to decide on dialysis modality. Attending a patient school and having a conversation about dialysis choice with a health professional is assumed to have had an impact on the decisional conflict before using the DG. The usability of the DG was not found to be sufficient, which might be caused by the respondents’ average age. Thus, the applicability of the DG cannot be definitively determined.
Citation
Please cite as:
Therkildsen SB, Hansen LH, Jensen LED, Finderup J
A Patient Decision Aid App for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Questionnaire Study