Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Feb 12, 2019
Date Accepted: Jun 29, 2019
Health researchers' use of social media: A scoping review
ABSTRACT
Background:
Health researchers are increasingly using social media in a professional capacity and the applications of social media for health researchers are vast. However, there is currently no published evidence synthesis of the ways in which health researchers use social media professionally and uncertainty remains as to how best to harness its potential.
Objective:
This scoping review explored how social media is being used by health researchers as reported in the literature.
Methods:
Scoping review methodology guided by Arksey and O’Malley and Levac and colleagues was used. Comprehensive searches based on the concepts of health research and social media were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ERIC, and Web of Science, with no limitations applied. Articles were screened at the title/abstract level and at full-text by two reviewers. One author extracted data that were analyzed descriptively to map the available evidence.
Results:
A total of 8,359 articles were screened at the title and abstract level, of which 719 were also assessed at full-text for eligibility. The 414 articles identified for inclusion were published in 278 different journals. Studies originated from 31 different countries with the most prevalent being the United States (52.7%). The health discipline of the first authors varied, with medicine (33.3%) the most common. A third of the articles covered health generally, with 61 health-specific topics covered using on average 1.33 (SD=0.7) different platforms. A quarter of all articles reported on social media use for participant recruitment (25.1%), followed by practical ways to use social media (15.5%), and use of social media for content analysis research (13.3%). Articles were categorized as ‘celebratory’ (i.e., opportunities for engagement, 72.2%), ‘contingent’ (i.e., opportunities and limitations possible, 22.7%) and ‘concerned’ (i.e., potentially harmful, 5.1%).
Conclusions:
Health researchers are increasingly publishing on their use of social media for a range of professional purposes. While most of the sentiment around the use of social media in health research was celebratory, the uses of social media varied widely. Future work is needed to support health researchers to navigate their social media use.
Citation