Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Interactive Journal of Medical Research

Date Submitted: Feb 12, 2019
Date Accepted: Jan 24, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Improving Patient Preference Elicitation by Applying Concepts From the Consumer Research Field: Narrative Literature Review

Ver Donck N, Vander Stichele G, Huys I

Improving Patient Preference Elicitation by Applying Concepts From the Consumer Research Field: Narrative Literature Review

Interact J Med Res 2020;9(1):e13684

DOI: 10.2196/13684

PMID: 32229460

PMCID: 7157502

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Improving Patient Preference Elicitation by Applying Concepts From the Consumer Research Field: Narrative Literature Review

  • Niki Ver Donck; 
  • Geert Vander Stichele; 
  • Isabelle Huys

Background:

Although preference research finds its origins in consumer research, preference elicitation methods have increasingly attracted attention in different decision-making contexts in health care. Simulating real-life decision making is believed to be important during consumer preference elicitation.

Objective:

The aims of this study were to compare the process of decision making between patients and consumers and to identify methods from the consumer research field that could be applied in patient preference elicitation.

Methods:

A narrative literature review was performed to identify preference elicitation concepts from a consumer context that could offer improvements in health care.

Results:

The process of decision making between patients and consumers was highly comparable. The following five concepts from the consumer research field that could effectively simulate a real-life decision-making process for applications in health care were identified: simulating alternatives, self-reflection, feedback-driven exploration, separated (adaptive) dual response, and arranging profiles in blocks.

Conclusions:

Owing to similarities in the decision-making process, patients could be considered as a subgroup of consumers, suggesting that preference elicitation concepts from the consumer field may be relevant in health care. Five concepts that help to simulate real-life decision making have the potential to improve patient preference elicitation. However, the extent to which real decision-making contexts can be mimicked in health care remains unknown.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ver Donck N, Vander Stichele G, Huys I

Improving Patient Preference Elicitation by Applying Concepts From the Consumer Research Field: Narrative Literature Review

Interact J Med Res 2020;9(1):e13684

DOI: 10.2196/13684

PMID: 32229460

PMCID: 7157502

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.