Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 7, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 11, 2019 - Apr 8, 2019
Date Accepted: May 31, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Artificial Intelligence and the Implementation Challenge

Shaw J, Rudzicz F, Jamieson T, Goldfarb A

Artificial Intelligence and the Implementation Challenge

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(7):e13659

DOI: 10.2196/13659

PMID: 31293245

PMCID: 6652121

Artificial Intelligence and the Implementation Challenge

  • James Shaw; 
  • Frank Rudzicz; 
  • Trevor Jamieson; 
  • Avi Goldfarb

ABSTRACT

Background:

Applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in health care have garnered much attention in recent years, but the implementation issues posed by AI have not been substantially addressed.

Objective:

In this paper, we focus on Machine Learning (ML) as a form of AI, and provide a framework for thinking about use cases of ML in health care. We structure our discussion of challenges in the implementation of ML in comparison to other technologies using the Framework of Nonadoption, Abandonment, and Challenges to the Scale-up Spread and Sustainability of Health and Care Technologies (NASSS).

Methods:

After providing an overview of AI technology, we describe use cases of ML as falling into the categories of decision support and automation. We suggest these use cases apply to clinical, operational, and epidemiological tasks, and that the primary function of ML in health care in the near term will be decision support. We then outline unique implementation issues posed by ML initiatives in the categories addressed by the NASSS framework, specifically including meaningful decision support, explainability, privacy, consent, algorithmic bias, security, scalability, the role of corporations, and the changing nature of health care work.

Results:

Ultimately, we suggest that the future of ML in health care remains positive but uncertain, as support from patients, the public, and a wide range of health care stakeholders is necessary to enable its meaningful implementation.

Conclusions:

If the implementation science community is to facilitate the adoption of ML in ways that stand to generate widespread benefits, the issues raised in this paper will require substantial attention in the coming years.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Shaw J, Rudzicz F, Jamieson T, Goldfarb A

Artificial Intelligence and the Implementation Challenge

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(7):e13659

DOI: 10.2196/13659

PMID: 31293245

PMCID: 6652121

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.