Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 4, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 7, 2019 - Apr 4, 2019
Date Accepted: Apr 15, 2020
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Translatability of a Wearable Technology Intervention to Increase Adolescent Physical Activity: Mixed Methods Implementation Evaluation

Koorts H, Salmon J, Timperio A, Ball K, Macfarlane S, Lai SK, Brown H, Chappel SE, Lewis M, Ridgers ND

Translatability of a Wearable Technology Intervention to Increase Adolescent Physical Activity: Mixed Methods Implementation Evaluation

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(8):e13573

DOI: 10.2196/13573

PMID: 32763872

PMCID: 7442941

Implementation evaluation of a wearable technology intervention to increase adolescent physical activity: Translatability into practice

  • Harriet Koorts; 
  • Jo Salmon; 
  • Anna Timperio; 
  • Kylie Ball; 
  • Susie Macfarlane; 
  • Samuel K Lai; 
  • Helen Brown; 
  • Stephanie E Chappel; 
  • Marina Lewis; 
  • Nicola D Ridgers

ABSTRACT

Background:

Wearable technology interventions combined with digital behaviour change resources provide opportunities to increase adolescents’ physical activity. Implementation of such interventions in real-world settings is unknown. The Raising Awareness of Physical Activity (RAW-PA) Study was a 12-week cluster randomised controlled trial targeting inactive adolescents attending schools in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas of Melbourne, Australia. The aims were to increase moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) using: (i) a wrist-worn Fitbit® Flex and app; (ii) weekly challenges; (iii) digital behaviour change resources; and (iv) email and/or text message alerts.

Objective:

This paper presents adolescents’ and teachers’ perceptions of RAW-PA in relation to program acceptability, feasibility and perceived impact, and adolescent engagement and adherence, and potential for future scale-up.

Methods:

A mixed method evaluation assessed: acceptability, engagement, feasibility, adherence, and perceived impact. Nine intervention schools and n=144 intervention adolescents were recruited. Only adolescents and teachers (n=17) in the intervention group were included in the analysis. Adolescents completed online surveys at baseline, and surveys and focus groups post-intervention. Teachers participated in interviews post-intervention. Facebook data tracked engagement with the online resources. Descriptive statistics were reported by sex. Qualitative data were analysed thematically.

Results:

Survey data were collected from 142 adolescents (99%) at baseline (mean age 13.70.4 years, 51% males) and 132 (98%) post-intervention. Fifteen focus groups (n=124) and nine interviews (n=17) were conducted. RAW-PA had good acceptability among adolescents and teachers. Adolescents perceived the intervention content was easy to understand (83%) and the Fitbit easy to use (93%). Half perceived the text messages to be useful (51%), and liked the weekly challenges (48%) and Facebook videos (38%). Facebook engagement declined over time, only 19% self-reported wearing the Fitbit daily at post-intervention. Adolescents perceived the Fitbit increased their physical activity motivation (71%) and awareness (78%). Online delivery facilitated implementation, although school-level policies restricting phone use were perceived as a potential inhibiter to program roll-out.

Conclusions:

RAW-PA showed good acceptability among adolescents and teachers. Implementation feasibility was enhanced by low levels of teacher burden for delivery. Future research exploring the feasibility of different strategies to engage adolescents with wearable technology interventions, and ways of maximising system-level embeddedness of interventions in practice, would greatly advance the field. Clinical Trial: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12616000899448. Date of registration: July 7, 2016


 Citation

Please cite as:

Koorts H, Salmon J, Timperio A, Ball K, Macfarlane S, Lai SK, Brown H, Chappel SE, Lewis M, Ridgers ND

Translatability of a Wearable Technology Intervention to Increase Adolescent Physical Activity: Mixed Methods Implementation Evaluation

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(8):e13573

DOI: 10.2196/13573

PMID: 32763872

PMCID: 7442941

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.