Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Jan 12, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 15, 2019 - Mar 12, 2019
Date Accepted: Jul 21, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
The potential for integrating mental health specialist video consultations in office-based routine primary care: A cross-sectional qualitative study among family physicians
ABSTRACT
Background:
Although real-time mental health specialist video consultations (MHSVC) have been proposed as an effective care model for treating patients with mental health conditions in primary care, little is known on the integration into routine practice from the perspective of family physicians (FPs) themselves.
Objective:
We aimed to determine the degree to which FPs advocate that MHSVC can be integrated in routine primary care, where most patients with mental health conditions receive treatment.
Methods:
In a cross-sectional qualitative study, we conducted four semi-structured focus groups and three telephone interviews in a sample of 19 FPs from urban and rural districts. We conducted a qualitative content analysis applying the Tailored Implementation in Chronic Diseases framework a combined bottom-up (data-driven) and top-down strategy for deriving key domains.
Results:
FPs indicated that MHSVC are a promising and practical way to address the most pressing challenges in current practice, i.e. to increase accessibility and coordination of specialized care. To facilitate the implementation of future MHSVC models, we compiled a checklist of recommendations that covers 1) buy-in from practices (e.g., emphasizing logistical and psychological relief for the practice), 2) engaging patients (e.g., establishing a trusted patient-provider-relationship), 3) setup and conduct of consultations (e.g., reliable emergency plans), and 4) fostering collaboration between FPs and MHS (e.g., kick-off meetings to build up trust).
Conclusions:
Leveraging the primary care practice as a familiar environment for patients, MHSVC provide timely specialist support and potentially lead to benefits for patients and more efficient processes of care. Integration should account for determinants of practice as described by the FPs. Clinical Trial: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00012487)
Citation
Per the author's request the PDF is not available.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.