Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics

Date Submitted: Dec 14, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 17, 2018 - Jan 3, 2019
Date Accepted: Jul 19, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Cox Proportional Hazard Regression Versus a Deep Learning Algorithm in the Prediction of Dementia: An Analysis Based on Periodic Health Examination

Kim WJ, Sung JM, Sung D, Chae MH, An SK, Namkoong K, Lee E, Chang HJ

Cox Proportional Hazard Regression Versus a Deep Learning Algorithm in the Prediction of Dementia: An Analysis Based on Periodic Health Examination

JMIR Med Inform 2019;7(3):e13139

DOI: 10.2196/13139

PMID: 31471957

PMCID: 6743261

Cox proportional hazard regression versus a deep learning algorithm in the prediction of dementia: an analysis based on periodic health examination

  • Woo Jung Kim; 
  • Ji Min Sung; 
  • David Sung; 
  • Myeong-Hun Chae; 
  • Suk Kyoon An; 
  • Kee Namkoong; 
  • Eun Lee; 
  • Hyuk-Jae Chang

ABSTRACT

Background:

As the world’s population is aging, there are growing needs for prevention and prediction of dementia among the general population. The availability of national time-series health examination data in South Korea invites an opportunity to utilise deep learning, an artificial intelligence technology, to expedite the analysis of mass and sequential data.

Objective:

We aimed to compare the discriminative accuracy between a time-series deep learning algorithm and conventional statistical methods for predicting all-cause dementia and Alzheimer’s dementia using periodic health examination data.

Methods:

We used a South Korean national health examination cohort database to identify dementia and Alzheimer’s dementia based on diagnostic codes in medical claims data over a 10-year period. Our analyses of all-cause dementia and Alzheimer’s dementia included 479,845 and 465,081 individuals, respectively, who were 40–79 years of age and without dementia at baseline. We compared the predictive performance of three models: Cox proportional hazards model using only baseline data (HR-B), Cox proportional hazards model using repeated measurements (HR-R), and deep learning model using repeated measurements (DL-R).

Results:

The discrimination indices (95% confidence interval) for HR-B, HR-R, and DL-R models predicting all-cause dementia were 0.84 (0.83–0.85), 0.87 (0.86–0.88), and 0.90 (0.90–0.90), respectively. The discrimination indices for HR-B, HR-R, and DL-R models predicting Alzheimer’s dementia were 0.87 (0.86–0.88), 0.90 (0.88–0.91), and 0.91 (0.91–0.91), respectively. Thus, the DL-R model showed the best performance, followed by the HR-R model, in predicting both all-cause dementia and Alzheimer’s dementia. The DL-R model was superior to the HR-R model in all validation groups tested.

Conclusions:

A deep learning algorithm using time-series data could be an accurate, cost-effective method of predicting dementia. A combination of deep learning and proportional hazards models could help enhance prevention strategies for dementia.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kim WJ, Sung JM, Sung D, Chae MH, An SK, Namkoong K, Lee E, Chang HJ

Cox Proportional Hazard Regression Versus a Deep Learning Algorithm in the Prediction of Dementia: An Analysis Based on Periodic Health Examination

JMIR Med Inform 2019;7(3):e13139

DOI: 10.2196/13139

PMID: 31471957

PMCID: 6743261

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.