Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics
Date Submitted: Oct 31, 2018
Date Accepted: Jun 10, 2019
Implementation of Computed-Aided Detection for Breast Cancer Screening in Clinical Settings: A Scoping Review
ABSTRACT
Background:
With the growth of machine learning applications, the practice of medicine is evolving. Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) is a software technology which has become widespread in radiology practices, particularly in breast cancer screening to improve detection rates at earlier stages. Many studies have investigated the diagnostic accuracy of CAD but its implementation in clinical settings has been largely overlooked.
Objective:
The aim of this scoping review was to summarize recent literature on the adoption and implementation of CAD during breast cancer screening by radiologists and to describe barriers and facilitators for CAD use.
Methods:
MEDLINE was searched for English, peer-reviewed articles that described CAD implementation, including barriers or facilitators, in breast cancer screening, published between 2010 to March 2018. Articles describing the diagnostic accuracy of CAD for breast cancer detection were excluded. The search returned 526 citations which were reviewed in duplicate through abstract and full text screening. Reference lists and cited references of included studies were reviewed.
Results:
9 articles met the inclusion criteria. The included literature showed that there is a tradeoff between facilitators and barriers for CAD use. Facilitators for CAD use were improved breast cancer detection rates, increased profitability of breast imaging, and time saved by replacing double reading. Identified barriers were less favorable perceptions of CAD compared to double reading by radiologists, an increase in recall rates of patients for further testing, increased costs, and unclear effect on patient outcomes.
Conclusions:
There is a gap in the literature between CAD’s well-established diagnostic accuracy and its implementation and use by radiologists. Generally, the perceptions of radiologists have not been considered and details of implementation approaches for adoption of CAD have not been reported. Cost-effectiveness of CAD has not been well established for breast cancer screening in various populations. Further research is needed on how to best facilitate CAD in radiology practices to optimize patient outcomes, and the views of radiologists need to be better incorporated along with advancing CAD use.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.