Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Oct 31, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 3, 2018 - Dec 29, 2018
Date Accepted: May 25, 2019
Date Submitted to PubMed: May 27, 2020
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Effectiveness of Social Media Approaches to Recruiting Young Adult Cigarillo Smokers: Cross-Sectional Study

Cavallo D, Lim R, Ishler K, Pagano M, Perovsek R, Antognoli E, Koopman-Gonzalez S, Trapl E, Flocke S

Effectiveness of Social Media Approaches to Recruiting Young Adult Cigarillo Smokers: Cross-Sectional Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(7):e12619

DOI: 10.2196/12619

PMID: 32459629

PMCID: 7407257

Effectiveness of social media approaches to recruiting young adult cigarillo smokers

  • David Cavallo; 
  • Rock Lim; 
  • Karen Ishler; 
  • Maria Pagano; 
  • Rachel Perovsek; 
  • Elizabeth Antognoli; 
  • Sarah Koopman-Gonzalez; 
  • Erika Trapl; 
  • Susan Flocke

ABSTRACT

Background:

The prevalence of social media (SM) use among youth and young adults suggests SM as an appropriate platform for study recruitment from this population. Previous studies have examined the use of SM for recruitment, but few have compared different SM platforms, and none to our knowledge have attempted to recruit cigarillo users.

Objective:

The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of different SM platforms and advertisement images for recruiting 14-28-year-old cigarillo users to complete a cigarillo use survey.

Methods:

We obtained objective data for advertisement impressions for a 39-week SM recruitment campaign. Advertisements were targeted by age, geography, and interests. Advertising effectiveness was defined as the percentage of approved surveys per advertising impression. Chi-square tests were performed comparing the effectiveness of different advertisement images and platforms.

Results:

Valid survey completers (n=1,089) were predominately older (25-28 years old, n=839, 77%). Five hundred and sixty-eight (52%) identified as male, n=335 (31%) as African American, and n=196 (18%) as Hispanic. Advertisements delivered via Facebook/Instagram were more effective than Twitter; n=311 (0.03%) vs. n=661 (0.02%), Χ2(1, N=4,026,453) = 21.45, P<.001. Across platforms, ads featuring exclusively an image of cigarillos were more effective (n=397, 0.06%) than ads with images of individuals smoking (n=254, 0.02%), individuals not smoking (n=239, .02%), and groups not smoking (n=82, 0.01%), Χ2(3, N = 4,026,453) = 133.73, P<.001.

Conclusions:

The campaign was effective in recruiting a diverse sample representative of important racial/ethnic categories. Advertisements on Facebook were more effective than Twitter. Including a cigarillo image was consistently the most effective advertisement design and should be considered by others recruiting cigarillo users via SM.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Cavallo D, Lim R, Ishler K, Pagano M, Perovsek R, Antognoli E, Koopman-Gonzalez S, Trapl E, Flocke S

Effectiveness of Social Media Approaches to Recruiting Young Adult Cigarillo Smokers: Cross-Sectional Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(7):e12619

DOI: 10.2196/12619

PMID: 32459629

PMCID: 7407257

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.