Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Date Submitted: Oct 26, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 27, 2018 - Dec 22, 2018
Date Accepted: Aug 19, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
How is the efficacy, safety and effectiveness of weight control and obesity management apps assessed? A systematic review
ABSTRACT
Background:
In recent years there has been a rise in the use of Mobile Applications (Apps) to prevent and treat adult overweight/obesity since they can facilitate the tracking of physical and dietary patterns, provide recommendations and advice, and include motivation strategies to achieve personalized goals. However, evidence available on the efficacy, effectiveness and safety criteria used for assessing theses Apps is scarce.
Objective:
To identify efficacy, safety and effectiveness criteria used to assess weight control, overweight and obesity management in Mobile health (mHealth) interventions through a systematic review.
Methods:
PUBMED, PsycINFO, Scopus, UK Tripdatabase, Clinical Trials Register and the Cochrane library were browsed up to May 2018. All kinds of clinical studies were considered. Two independent reviewers assessed quality using SING criteria. Ratings were used to provide an overall score for each study (low, moderate or high). Data were synthesized in evidence tables.
Results:
From 226 potentially relevant publications, only 21 studies were included. Of those, 11 (52%) were randomized control trials, 8 were one-single arm studies (38%) and 2 were controlled trials (10%). The studies were classified as low (10), high (6) and moderate (5) quality according SING criteria. All of them focused on efficacy, but none on effectiveness and safety. In 8 studies the Apps were used as stand-alone interventions, the rest were multicomponent studies that included other tools for support such as sensors or web sites. The main management tool included in the Apps was feedback messaging (18 Apps), followed by mechanisms of self-monitoring and setting goals (14 each one). The majority of the studies selected considered weight/body mass index loss as the main outcome (15) followed by changes in physical activity (11) and diet (9). Regarding the outputs, the most reported were Usability/Adherence/Engagement (13), followed by Acceptability and Satisfaction (4 each one).
Conclusions:
There is a remarkable heterogeneity among studies and most of them have methodological limitations which left considerable room for improvement regarding the quality of the studies. This research allows for the identification of relevant criteria to assess efficacy of weight control in overweight and obesity management mHealth interventions, but no information about safety and effectiveness was found. Clinical Trial: The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42017056761) on 14 February 2017.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.