Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Oct 4, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 6, 2018 - Dec 1, 2018
Date Accepted: Apr 25, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Care Team Perspectives and Acceptance of Telehealth in Scaling a Home-Based Primary Care Program: Qualitative Study

Kozikowski A, Shotwell J, Wool E, Slaboda J, Abrashkin K, Rhodes K, Smith K, Pekmezaris R, Norman GJ

Care Team Perspectives and Acceptance of Telehealth in Scaling a Home-Based Primary Care Program: Qualitative Study

JMIR Aging 2019;2(1):e12415

DOI: 10.2196/12415

PMID: 31518266

PMCID: 6716443

Care Team Perspectives and Acceptance of Telehealth in Scaling a Home-Based Primary Care Program: A Qualitative Study

  • Andrzej Kozikowski; 
  • Jillian Shotwell; 
  • Eve Wool; 
  • Jill Slaboda; 
  • Karen Abrashkin; 
  • Karin Rhodes; 
  • Kristopher Smith; 
  • Renee Pekmezaris; 
  • Gregory J. Norman

ABSTRACT

Background:

Novel and sustainable approaches to scale Home-Based Primary Care (HBPC) programs are needed to meet the medical needs of a growing number of homebound older adults in the US. Telehealth may be a viable option for scaling HBPC programs.

Objective:

The purpose of this qualitative study was to gain insight into the perspectives of HBPC staff regarding adopting telehealth technology to scale the program.

Methods:

We collected qualitative data from HBPC staff (physicians, registered nurses, nurse practitioners, care managers, social workers, and medical coordinators) at a practice in the New York Metropolitan area through 16 semi-structured interviews and 3 focus groups. Data were analyzed thematically using the template analysis approach with Self-Determination Theory concepts (relatedness, competence, and autonomy) as an analytical lens.

Results:

Four broad themes (pros and cons of scaling, technology impact on staff autonomy, technology impact on competence in providing care, and technology impact on the patient-caregiver-provider relationship) and multiple second-level themes emerged from the analysis. Within the theme of pros and cons of scaling, staff acknowledged the need to scale the program without diminishing effective patient-centered care. Within the theme of technology impact on staff autonomy, participants perceived alerts generated from patients and caregivers using telehealth as a potentially increasing burden and necessitating a rapid response from an already busy staff while increasing ambiguity. Regarding technology impact on competence in providing care, participants noted that it could increase efficiency and enable more informed care provision. Regarding technology impact on the patient-provider relationship, participants noted the opportunity to make caregivers part of the team through telehealth. Staff members, however, were concerned that patients or caregivers might unnecessarily over utilize the technology, and that some visits are more appropriate in-person rather than via telehealth.

Conclusions:

These findings suggest the importance of taking into account the perspectives of medical professionals regarding telehealth adoption. A proactive approach exploring the benefits and concerns professionals perceive in the adoption of health technology within the HBPC program is likely to facilitate the integration of telehealth innovations. Clinical Trial: Not applicable


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kozikowski A, Shotwell J, Wool E, Slaboda J, Abrashkin K, Rhodes K, Smith K, Pekmezaris R, Norman GJ

Care Team Perspectives and Acceptance of Telehealth in Scaling a Home-Based Primary Care Program: Qualitative Study

JMIR Aging 2019;2(1):e12415

DOI: 10.2196/12415

PMID: 31518266

PMCID: 6716443

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.