Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health

Date Submitted: Sep 24, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 28, 2018 - Nov 22, 2018
Date Accepted: Dec 19, 2018
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Young People’s Satisfaction With the Online Mental Health Service eheadspace: Development and Implementation of a Service Satisfaction Measure

Rickwood D, Wallace A, Kennedy V, O’Sullivan S, Telford N, Leicester S

Young People’s Satisfaction With the Online Mental Health Service eheadspace: Development and Implementation of a Service Satisfaction Measure

JMIR Ment Health 2019;6(4):e12169

DOI: 10.2196/12169

PMID: 30994470

PMCID: 6492057

Young peoples’ satisfaction with an online mental health service - eheadspace

  • Debra Rickwood; 
  • Alison Wallace; 
  • Vanessa Kennedy; 
  • Shaunagh O’Sullivan; 
  • Nic Telford; 
  • Steven Leicester

ABSTRACT

Background:

Online youth mental health services are an expanding approach to meeting service need, and can be used as the first step in a stepped-care approach. Limited evidence exists, however, regarding satisfaction with online services and there is no standardised service satisfaction measure.

Objective:

This study implemented an online youth mental health service satisfaction questionnaire within eheadspace, an online youth mental health service. The aims were to test the questionnaire’s psychometric properties and identify current levels of satisfaction among service users, as well as identify client and service contact characteristics that affect satisfaction.

Methods:

Data were collected from 2,280 eheadspace clients via an online questionnaire advertised and accessed through the eheadspace service platform between September, 2016 and February, 2018. Client and service contact characteristics, potential outcomes, session and service feedback data were collected.

Results:

The service satisfaction questionnaire demonstrated high internal consistency for the overall satisfaction scale and its three subscales: session satisfaction, potential outcomes and service satisfaction. A three-factor model was the best fit to the data, although including a higher order unidimensional construct of overall satisfaction was also a reasonable fit. Overall, young people were very satisfied with eheadspace. Service characteristics, but not client characteristics, were significantly associated with satisfaction. Young people were more satisfied with eheadspace when they had greater engagement as evident through receiving support rather than briefer service provision, having a longer session, and not previously attending a face-to-face headspace centre.

Conclusions:

The online youth mental health service satisfaction questionnaire developed for and implemented in eheadspace showed good psychometric properties. The measure is brief, has good internal consistency and has a clear factor structure. The measure could be adapted for use in other online youth mental health services. The young people using eheadspace and completing the feedback survey were highly satisfied. Greater engagement with the online service was shown to be associated with greater satisfaction. No specific client demographic groups were shown to be more or less satisfied.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Rickwood D, Wallace A, Kennedy V, O’Sullivan S, Telford N, Leicester S

Young People’s Satisfaction With the Online Mental Health Service eheadspace: Development and Implementation of a Service Satisfaction Measure

JMIR Ment Health 2019;6(4):e12169

DOI: 10.2196/12169

PMID: 30994470

PMCID: 6492057

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.