Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Jul 25, 2018
Date Accepted: Sep 14, 2018
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Preliminary Effectiveness of a Smartphone App to Reduce Depressive Symptoms in the Workplace: Feasibility and Acceptability Study

Deady M, Johnston D, Milne D, Glozier N, Peters D, Calvo R, Harvey S

Preliminary Effectiveness of a Smartphone App to Reduce Depressive Symptoms in the Workplace: Feasibility and Acceptability Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018;6(12):e11661

DOI: 10.2196/11661

PMID: 30514694

PMCID: 6299234

Preliminary Effectiveness of a Smartphone App to Reduce Depressive Symptoms in the Workplace: Feasibility and Acceptability Study

  • Mark Deady; 
  • David Johnston; 
  • David Milne; 
  • Nick Glozier; 
  • Dorian Peters; 
  • Rafael Calvo; 
  • Samuel Harvey

ABSTRACT

Background:

The workplace represents a unique setting for mental health interventions. Due to range of job-related factors, employees in male-dominated industries are at an elevated risk. However, these at-risk groups are often overlooked. HeadGear is a smartphone app–based intervention designed to reduce depressive symptoms and increase well-being in these populations.

Objective:

This paper presents the development and pilot testing of the app’s usability, acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary effectiveness.

Methods:

The development process took place from January 2016 to August 2017. Participants for prototype testing (n=21; stage 1) were recruited from industry partner organizations to assess acceptability and utility. A 5-week effectiveness and feasibility pilot study (n=84; stage 2) was then undertaken, utilizing social media recruitment. Demographic data, acceptability and utility questionnaires, depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), and other mental health measures were collected.

Results:

The majority of respondents felt HeadGear was easy to use (92%), easily understood (92%), were satisfied with the app (67%), and would recommend it to a friend (75%; stage 1). Stage 2 found that compared with baseline, depression and anxiety symptoms were significantly lower at follow-up (t30=2.53; P=.02 and t30=2.18; P=.04, respectively), days of sick leave in past month (t28=2.38; P=.02), and higher self-reported job performance (t28=−2.09; P=.046; stage 2). Over 90% of respondents claimed it helped improve their mental fitness, and user feedback was again positive. Attrition was high across the stages.

Conclusions:

Overall, HeadGear was well received, and preliminary findings indicate it may provide an innovative new platform for improving mental health outcomes. Unfortunately, attrition was a significant issue, and findings should be interpreted with caution. The next stage of evaluation will be a randomized controlled trial. If found to be efficacious, the app has the potential to reduce disease burden and improve health in this at-risk group.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Deady M, Johnston D, Milne D, Glozier N, Peters D, Calvo R, Harvey S

Preliminary Effectiveness of a Smartphone App to Reduce Depressive Symptoms in the Workplace: Feasibility and Acceptability Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018;6(12):e11661

DOI: 10.2196/11661

PMID: 30514694

PMCID: 6299234

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.