Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Jul 12, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 16, 2018 - Aug 22, 2018
Date Accepted: Oct 14, 2018
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

A Fall Risk mHealth App for Older Adults: Development and Usability Study

Hsieh KL, Fanning JT, Rogers WA, Wood TA, Sosnoff JJ

A Fall Risk mHealth App for Older Adults: Development and Usability Study

JMIR Aging 2018;1(2):e11569

DOI: 10.2196/11569

PMID: 31518234

PMCID: 6716481

A Fall Risk mHealth App for Older Adults: Development and Usability Study

  • Katherine L Hsieh; 
  • Jason T Fanning; 
  • Wendy A Rogers; 
  • Tyler A Wood; 
  • Jacob J Sosnoff

ABSTRACT

Background:

Falls are the leading cause of injury-related death in older adults. Due to various constraints, objective fall risk screening is seldom performed in clinical settings. Smartphones offer a high potential to provide fall risk screening for older adults in home settings. However, there is limited understanding of whether smartphone technology for falls screening is usable by older adults who present age-related changes in perceptual, cognitive, and motor capabilities.

Objective:

The aims of this study were to develop a fall risk mobile health (mHealth) app and to determine the usability of the fall risk app in healthy, older adults.

Methods:

A fall risk app was developed that consists of a health history questionnaire and 5 progressively challenging mobility tasks to measure individual fall risk. An iterative design-evaluation process of semistructured interviews was performed to determine the usability of the app on a smartphone and tablet. Participants also completed a Systematic Usability Scale (SUS). In the first round of interviews, 6 older adults participated, and in the second round, 5 older adults participated. Interviews were videotaped and transcribed, and the data were coded to create themes. Average SUS scores were calculated for the smartphone and tablet.

Results:

There were 2 themes identified from the first round of interviews, related to perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness. While instructions for the balance tasks were difficult to understand, participants found it beneficial to learn about their risk for falls, found the app easy to follow, and reported confidence in using the app on their own. Modifications were made to the app, and following the second round of interviews, participants reported high ease of use and usefulness in learning about their risk of falling. Few differences were reported between using a smartphone or tablet. Average SUS scores ranged from 79 to 84.

Conclusions:

Our fall risk app was found to be highly usable by older adults as reported from interviews and high scores on the SUS. When designing a mHealth app for older adults, developers should include clear and simple instructions and preventative strategies to improve health. Furthermore, if the design accommodates for age-related sensory changes, smartphones can be as effective as tablets. A mobile app to assess fall risk has the potential to be used in home settings by older adults.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Hsieh KL, Fanning JT, Rogers WA, Wood TA, Sosnoff JJ

A Fall Risk mHealth App for Older Adults: Development and Usability Study

JMIR Aging 2018;1(2):e11569

DOI: 10.2196/11569

PMID: 31518234

PMCID: 6716481

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.