JMIR Publications

ABSTRACT

Background:

The quality and quantity of families’ support systems during pregnancy can affect maternal and fetal outcomes. The support systems of expecting families can include many elements, such as family members, friends, and work or community groups. Emerging health information technologies such as social media, Internet websites, and mobile apps provide new resources for pregnant families to augment their support systems and to fill information gaps.

Objective:

This study sought to determine the number and nature of the components of the support systems of pregnant women and their caregivers, and the role of health information technologies in these support systems. We examined the differences between pregnant women’s support systems and those of their caregivers and the associations between support system composition and stress levels.

Methods:

We enrolled pregnant women and caregivers from an advanced maternal fetal and group prenatal care clinics. Participants completed surveys assessing sociodemographic characteristics, health literacy, numeracy, and stress levels, and they were asked to draw a picture of their support system. Support system elements were extracted from drawings, categorized by type (i.e., individual persons, groups, technologies, and other), and summarized for pregnant women and caregivers. Participant characteristics and support system elements were compared using Pearson Chi-square test for categorical variables and Wilcoxon ranked sum test for continuous variables. Associations between support system characteristics and stress levels were measured with Spearman correlation coefficient.

Results:

The study enrolled 100 participants: 71 pregnant women and 29 caregivers. The support systems of pregnant women were significantly larger than those of caregivers, with an average of 7.4 components for pregnant women and 5.4 components for caregivers (P=0.003). For all participants, the most commonly reported support system elements were individual persons (60.3% of support systems), followed by people groups (19.3%), technologies (16.2%), and other resources (4.2%). Pregnant women’s and caregivers’ technology preferences within their support systems differed: pregnant women more often identified informational websites, apps, and social media as parts of their support systems, whereas caregivers more frequently reported general Internet search engines. The size and components of these support systems were not associated with levels of stress.

Conclusions:

This study is one of the first demonstrating that technologies comprise a substantial portion of the support systems of pregnant women and their caregivers. Pregnant women more frequently reported specific medical information websites as part of their support system, whereas caregivers more often reported general Internet search engines. Although social support is important for maternal and fetal health outcomes, no associations among stress, support system size, and support system components were found in this study. As health information technologies continue to evolve and their adoption increases, their role in patient and caregiver support systems and their effects should be further explored.