Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Apr 25, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 26, 2018 - Jun 20, 2018
Date Accepted: Apr 4, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Perceptions of the Diabetes Online Community’s Credibility, Social Capital, and Help and Harm: Cross-Sectional Comparison Between Baby Boomers and Younger Adults

Litchman ML, Edelman LS

Perceptions of the Diabetes Online Community’s Credibility, Social Capital, and Help and Harm: Cross-Sectional Comparison Between Baby Boomers and Younger Adults

JMIR Aging 2019;2(2):e10857

DOI: 10.2196/10857

PMID: 31573907

PMCID: 6787528

Baby Boomer Perceptions of Diabetes Online Community Credibility, Social Capital, Help and Harm is Similar to Younger Adults

  • Michelle L. Litchman; 
  • Linda S. Edelman

ABSTRACT

Background:

Background:

The use of online health communities such as the diabetes online community (DOC) is growing. Individuals who engage in the diabetes online community (DOC) are able to interact with peers who have the same medical condition. It is not known if older adults are perceiving the DOC differently than younger adults.

Objective:

Objective:

The purpose of this study was two-fold: 1) to describe social capital, perceived source credibility, help and harm among DOC users, and 2) to examine differences in social capital, perceived source credibility, help and harm among baby boomer (born between 1946 and 1964) and younger adult (born between 1965-1996) DOC users.

Methods:

Methods:

This study represents a subset of participants from a larger study of DOC users. Adults with diabetes were recruited from the DOC to participate in a cross-sectional survey. Baby boomer and younger adult demographics, eHealth use (reasons to join the DOC, DOC intensity, DOC engagement, internet social capital, and help or harm from the DOC), source credibility, health-related quality of life, and diabetes self-care were collected. We examined relationships between variables and examined differences between baby boomers and younger adults.

Results:

Results:

Baby boomers (N=76) and younger adult counterparts (N=102) participated in this study. Participants scored their diabetes healthcare team (M=33.5, SD=8) significantly higher than the DOC (M=32, SD=6.4) with regard to competence (p<.05) and trustworthiness (diabetes healthcare team, M=36.3, SD=7.1; DOC M=33.6, SD=6.2; p<.001). High bonding and bridging social capital correlated with high DOC intensity (r=.629, p<.001 and r=.676, p<.001 and respectively) and high DOC engagement (r=.474, p<.01 and r=.507, p=<.01 and respectively). The greater majority (69.8%) reported the DOC as being helpful and 1.8% reported the DOC had caused minor harm. Baby boomers perceive DOC credibility, social capital, help and harm similarly to their younger adult counterparts.

Conclusions:

Conclusions:

Baby boomers are using and perceiving the DOC similarly to younger adults. DOC users find the DOC to be credible, however, scored their healthcare team higher with regards to competence and trustworthiness. The DOC is beneficial with low risk and may augment current diabetes care.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Litchman ML, Edelman LS

Perceptions of the Diabetes Online Community’s Credibility, Social Capital, and Help and Harm: Cross-Sectional Comparison Between Baby Boomers and Younger Adults

JMIR Aging 2019;2(2):e10857

DOI: 10.2196/10857

PMID: 31573907

PMCID: 6787528

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.