Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Jun 4, 2026
Date Accepted: Oct 21, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Smartwatch-Measured Clinician Perceptions of Emergency Department Crowding and Their Association With Objective Metrics: Prospective Observational Study

Yoon JS, Park S, Muir KJ, DeGuzman PB, Shin SY, Chang H, Kim T, Lee SU, Hong S, Cha WC, Yoo J

Smartwatch-Measured Clinician Perceptions of Emergency Department Crowding and Their Association With Objective Metrics: Prospective Observational Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2026;14:e103317

DOI: 10.2196/103317

PMID: 43007704

Smartwatch-Measured Clinician Perceptions of Emergency Department Crowding and Their Association with Objective Metrics: A Prospective Observational Study

  • Ji Sim Yoon; 
  • Sookyung Park; 
  • K. Jane Muir; 
  • Pamela B. DeGuzman; 
  • So Yeon Shin; 
  • Hansol Chang; 
  • Taerim Kim; 
  • Se Uk Lee; 
  • Sungjun Hong; 
  • Won Chul Cha; 
  • Junsang Yoo

ABSTRACT

Background:

Emergency department (ED) crowding compromises patient safety and increases clinical workload. Available metrics often fail to identify real-time physical and cognitive workloads driven by complex patient needs. Clinician perception may provide a complementary measure.

Objective:

To address current limitations by examining the relationship between real-time ED-perceived crowding (EDPC) and established objective metrics.

Methods:

We conducted a prospective study from 25 November to 13 December 2024 in a tertiary ED operating with reduced bed capacity and attending-only staffing due to a national medical workforce shortage. Twenty-eight clinicians (attending physicians and charge nurses) recorded EDPC hourly using a smartwatch-based Ecological Momentary Assessment system. Inter-rater agreement was assessed using Gwet’s AC2. Hourly median EDPC values were compared with objective crowding metrics derived from electronic health records: Emergency Department Occupancy Ratio (EDOR), National Emergency Department Overcrowding Score (NEDOCS), and Emergency Department Workload Index (EDWIN). Statistical associations were evaluated using Pearson correlation and time-lag analyses.

Results:

We analyzed 1,846 ED visits and 447 hourly evaluations. The inter-rater reliability of EDPC was high (Gwet’s AC2=0.742). EDOR showed the strongest correlation with EDPC (r=0.56). NEDOCS showed moderate correlations (r=0.47–0.51), whereas EDWIN showed minimal or no significant correlation. EDPC, EDOR, and NEDOCS followed similar trajectories, whereas EDWIN fluctuated with physician shift changes. EDPC was more strongly associated with maximum values than with mean or median values.

Conclusions:

EDPC aligns most closely with EDOR and NEDOCS, particularly peak values, indicating that clinician-perceived crowding reflects short-term surges. EDWIN shows poor alignment, suggesting that staffing-sensitive metrics may not accurately reflect perceived burden in environments with significant shifts in medical personnel and bed ratios. In conclusion, EDPC captures operational and cognitive burdens not fully represented by existing indices. Smartwatch-based real-time measurement of EDPC is feasible and may offer a complementary signal to monitor acute crowding.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Yoon JS, Park S, Muir KJ, DeGuzman PB, Shin SY, Chang H, Kim T, Lee SU, Hong S, Cha WC, Yoo J

Smartwatch-Measured Clinician Perceptions of Emergency Department Crowding and Their Association With Objective Metrics: Prospective Observational Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2026;14:e103317

DOI: 10.2196/103317

PMID: 43007704

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.