Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 24, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 25, 2018 - Aug 17, 2018
Date Accepted: Dec 12, 2018
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The Effect of Online Effort and Reputation of Physicians on Patients’ Choice: 3-Wave Data Analysis of China’s Good Doctor Website

Deng Z, Hong Z, Zhang W, Evans R, Chen Y

The Effect of Online Effort and Reputation of Physicians on Patients’ Choice: 3-Wave Data Analysis of China’s Good Doctor Website

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(3):e10170

DOI: 10.2196/10170

PMID: 30848726

PMCID: 6429049

Do the Online Efforts of Physicians and their Reputation Matter? A Three-Wave Data Analysis of China’s Good Doctor Website

  • Zhaohua Deng; 
  • Ziying Hong; 
  • Wei Zhang; 
  • Richard Evans; 
  • Yanyan Chen

ABSTRACT

Background:

Nowadays, patients are seeking physician information more frequently via the Internet. Physician Rating Websites (PRWs) have been recognized as the most convenient way to gain insight and detailed information about specific physicians before consultation. However, little is known about how the information provided on PRWs may affect patients’ decisions to seek medical advice.

Objective:

This study aims to examine the relationship between the online reputation of physician and their perceived efforts on PRWs, and their aggregated number of patients consulted with online.

Methods:

A model, based on social exchange theory, was developed to analyze the factors associated with the number of online patients. A three-wave data collection exercise, covering 4041 physicians on China’s Good Doctor Website, was conducted during the months of February, April and June, 2017. Data was analyzed using a liner regression model and fixed effect model.

Results:

The adjusted R-squared in the linear regression model was 0.55 and 0.57, while in the fixed effect model, it was seen to be 0.75. Both the linear regression and fixed effect models yielded a high fit. A positive effect of physicians’ effort on the aggregated number of online patients was identified in all models (0.29, 0.37; 0.21; p<0.01). The proxies of physicians’ reputations indicated different results, with the physicians’ homepage reviews (0.43, 0.46; 0.166; p<0.01) and number of votes received (0.33, 0.27;0.27; p<0.01) being seen as positive. Virtual gifts were not significant in all models, while thank-you letters were only significant in the fixed effect model (0.09, p<0.05). The effort of physicians’ online is positively associated with their aggregated number of patients consulted, while the effect of a physician’s reputation remains unfixed. The control effect of physician’s gender, position and hospital’s level was not significant in all linear regressions.

Conclusions:

Both the effort and reputation of physicians’ online contribute to the increased number of patients consulted with online, however, the influence of a physician’s reputation varies. This may imply that physicians’ online effort and reputation is critical in attracting patients online, and strategic manipulation of physician profiles is worthy of study. Practical insights are also discussed.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Deng Z, Hong Z, Zhang W, Evans R, Chen Y

The Effect of Online Effort and Reputation of Physicians on Patients’ Choice: 3-Wave Data Analysis of China’s Good Doctor Website

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(3):e10170

DOI: 10.2196/10170

PMID: 30848726

PMCID: 6429049

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.