Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Perioperative Medicine

Date Submitted: Feb 18, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 23, 2018 - Apr 20, 2018
Date Accepted: Sep 24, 2018
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Postoperative Home Monitoring After Joint Replacement: Retrospective Outcome Study Comparing Cases With Matched Historical Controls

Yang H, Dervin G, Madden S, Fayad A, Beaulé P, Gagné S, Crossan ML, Wheeler K, Afagh M, Zhang T, Taljaard M

Postoperative Home Monitoring After Joint Replacement: Retrospective Outcome Study Comparing Cases With Matched Historical Controls

JMIR Perioper Med 2018;1(2):e10169

DOI: 10.2196/10169

PMID: 33401365

PMCID: 7728407

Postoperative Home Monitoring After Joint Replacement: Retrospective Outcome Study Comparing Cases With Matched Historical Controls

  • Homer Yang; 
  • Geoff Dervin; 
  • Susan Madden; 
  • Ashraf Fayad; 
  • Paul Beaulé; 
  • Sylvain Gagné; 
  • Mary Lou Crossan; 
  • Kathryn Wheeler; 
  • Melody Afagh; 
  • Tinghua Zhang; 
  • Monica Taljaard

ABSTRACT

Background:

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients undergoing postoperative home monitoring (POHM) following elective primary hip or knee replacements.

Objective:

The objectives of our study were to compare the cost per patient, readmissions rate, emergency room visits, and mortality within 30 days to the historical standard of care using descriptive analysis.

Methods:

After Research Ethics Board approval, patients who were enrolled and had completed a POHM study were individually matched to historical controls by age, American Society of Anesthesiology class, and procedure at a ratio 1:2.

Results:

A total of 54 patients in the study group and 107 in the control group were eligible for the analysis. Compared with the historical standard of care, the average cost per case was Can $5826.32 (SD 1418.89) in the POHM group and Can $9198.58 (SD 1513.59) for controls. After 30 days, there were 2 emergency room visits (3.7%) and 0 readmissions in the POHM group, whereas there were 8 emergency room visits (7.5%) and 2 readmissions (1.9%) in the control group. No mortalities occurred in either group.

Conclusions:

The POHM study offers an early hospital discharge pathway for elective hip and knee procedures at a 38% reduction of the standard of care cost. The multidisciplinary transitional POHM team may provide a reliable forum to minimize readmissions, and emergency room visits within 30 days postoperatively. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02143232; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02143232 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/73WQ9QR6P)


 Citation

Please cite as:

Yang H, Dervin G, Madden S, Fayad A, Beaulé P, Gagné S, Crossan ML, Wheeler K, Afagh M, Zhang T, Taljaard M

Postoperative Home Monitoring After Joint Replacement: Retrospective Outcome Study Comparing Cases With Matched Historical Controls

JMIR Perioper Med 2018;1(2):e10169

DOI: 10.2196/10169

PMID: 33401365

PMCID: 7728407

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.