Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: May 13, 2026
Date Accepted: Sep 21, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Comparative Effectiveness of Digital Exercise-Based Interventions for Improving Balance in Older Adults: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis With GRADE Certainty of Evidence

Li F, Li X, Li Q, Gong X, Shi K, Huang Y, Feng X, Zhang D

Comparative Effectiveness of Digital Exercise-Based Interventions for Improving Balance in Older Adults: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis With GRADE Certainty of Evidence

JMIR Aging 2026;9:e101231

DOI: 10.2196/101231

Comparative Effectiveness of Digital Exercise-Based Interventions for Improving Balance in Older Adults: A Network Meta-Analysis With GRADE Certainty of Evidence

  • Fangbo Li; 
  • Xuecheng Li; 
  • Qingfang Li; 
  • Xiaoqin Gong; 
  • Kexin Shi; 
  • Yongyu Huang; 
  • Xiaowei Feng; 
  • Dong Zhang

ABSTRACT

Background:

Technology-based rehabilitation is increasingly used for balance training in older adults. A 2023 network meta-analysis (NMA) found only exergaming with motion capture significantly superior to no treatment, but the evidence has since expanded and no GRADE certainty appraisal had been applied.

Objective:

To update comparative effectiveness of five technology categories (exergaming with balance platforms [EBP], exergaming with motion capture [EMC], other serious games [OSG], wearable devices [IW], telerehabilitation [Tele]) versus conventional exercise (CE) and no treatment (NT), applying GRADE adapted for NMA.

Methods:

Systematic search (through April 2025) identified 60 RCTs (n=3,469; mean age 73.4 years). Random-effects NMA covered four networks (balance, functional scales, TUG, gait speed). RoB 2 and SUCRA ranking were used.

Results:

In the balance network, Tele (SMD=0.69), EBP (0.63), and EMC (0.58) significantly outperformed NT. For TUG, similar significant effects were seen for EBP (0.81), EMC (0.79), and Tele (0.82). Tele ranked first in SUCRA (76.3%). No technology significantly exceeded CE. GRADE certainty was moderate for EBP and EMC vs. NT in the TUG network only; all other comparisons were low or very low. Dropout rates did not differ between technology and control arms (OR=1.10).

Conclusions:

Telerehabilitation, EBP, and EMC improve balance in older adults, with telerehabilitation as the highest-ranked modality. Evidence certainty remains moderate at best, warranting larger, rigorous trials. Clinical Trial: PROSPERO with the registration number CRD420261380567


 Citation

Please cite as:

Li F, Li X, Li Q, Gong X, Shi K, Huang Y, Feng X, Zhang D

Comparative Effectiveness of Digital Exercise-Based Interventions for Improving Balance in Older Adults: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis With GRADE Certainty of Evidence

JMIR Aging 2026;9:e101231

DOI: 10.2196/101231

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.