Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: May 7, 2026
Date Accepted: Sep 28, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Artificial Intelligence Use Among Health Care Professionals in the United States and United Kingdom: Cross-National Survey

Sezgin E, Lee JA, Jadczyk T, Taxter AJ

Artificial Intelligence Use Among Health Care Professionals in the United States and United Kingdom: Cross-National Survey

JMIR Form Res 2026;10:e100681

DOI: 10.2196/100681

PMID: 42896135

Artificial Intelligence Use Among Healthcare Professionals in the United States and United Kingdom: A Cross-National Survey

  • Emre Sezgin; 
  • Jennifer A Lee; 
  • Tomasz Jadczyk; 
  • Alysha J Taxter

ABSTRACT

Background:

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly entering clinical work, but evidence remains limited on how health care professionals (HCPs) use AI in routine practice and whether use occurs within sanctioned systems or outside institutional governance.

Objective:

We surveyed 524 healthcare professionals (HCPs) in the United States and United Kingdom to examine workplace generative AI use, access, and barriers in two high-maturity health settings.

Methods:

We surveyed 524 healthcare professionals (HCPs) in the United States and United Kingdom to examine workplace generative AI use, access, and barriers in two high-maturity health settings.

Results:

Overall, 75.8% of HCPs reported recent AI use, mainly for documentation, literature search, and clinical decision support. Usage breadth was similar by country, but role differences were pronounced. Physicians reported broader use and were significantly more likely to access AI via personal, non-employer-provided tools (60.4% vs. 31.0% for nurses; P<.01). Personal tools were the most common access mode overall (40.1%).

Conclusions:

AI use is common, but institutional access lags adoption. Shifting use from personal accounts toward governed, approved systems is a key priority.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Sezgin E, Lee JA, Jadczyk T, Taxter AJ

Artificial Intelligence Use Among Health Care Professionals in the United States and United Kingdom: Cross-National Survey

JMIR Form Res 2026;10:e100681

DOI: 10.2196/100681

PMID: 42896135

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.