Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Apr 5, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 6, 2026 - Jun 1, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Incentivisation in Communities of Practice for Chronic Conditions: Systematic Review

  • Florence Kashora; 
  • Aishani Paul; 
  • Alice Pemberton; 
  • Ololade Kufeji; 
  • Claire Madzura; 
  • Lee Smith; 
  • Usman Jaffer

ABSTRACT

Background:

Incentivisation is increasingly used to maintain engagement and support behaviour change within communities of practice (CoPs), yet its effectiveness across chronic disease contexts remains uncertain.

Objective:

To examine how incentives are integrated into CoPs and related peer-support models, and to assess their impact on participant activation, engagement, and health-related outcomes.

Methods:

PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to June 2025 using predefined terms relating to CoPs, incentivisation, and patient-centred outcomes. Peer-reviewed empirical studies involving incentivised CoPs or analogous peer-support interventions for adults with chronic conditions were eligible. Four reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias in line with PRISMA 2020 guidance. Heterogeneity in design and outcomes required narrative synthesis.

Results:

From 667 records, four randomised controlled trials met inclusion criteria. Financial incentives produced the greatest short-term gains in physical activity, while non-financial approaches such as gamification, points, badges, and structured peer support yielded modest improvements in step count, treatment adherence, or diet quality. No consistent effects were observed for patient activation, self-efficacy, mental health, or quality of life. Engagement moderated effectiveness, although attrition was common.

Conclusions:

Incentivisation can enhance short-term behavioural outcomes within CoPs, but evidence for sustained psychosocial benefit is limited. Larger, longer-term studies are needed to clarify which incentive strategies deliver durable improvements in engagement and self-management. Clinical Trial: This review was registered on PROSPERO, an international prospective register of systematic review (January 2026, reference CRD420251244276).


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kashora F, Paul A, Pemberton A, Kufeji O, Madzura C, Smith L, Jaffer U

Incentivisation in Communities of Practice for Chronic Conditions: Systematic Review

JMIR Preprints. 05/04/2026:97220

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.97220

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/97220

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.