Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Medical Informatics (no longer under consideration since Apr 06, 2026)

Date Submitted: Mar 25, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 6, 2026 - Apr 6, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

A Review and Proposed AI-Driven Framework for MDS Assessment Validation in Skilled Nursing Facilities

  • Meghana Bhimavarapu

ABSTRACT

Background:

Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments determine both clinical care planning and Medicare reimbursement under the Patient-Driven Payment Model (PDPM) in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). Documentation errors arising from assessment complexity, workforce instability, and compressed completion timelines are widespread and financially consequential. Traditional retrospective, sample-based audits fail to intercept most errors before submission.

Objective:

This paper reviews the literature on AI-assisted clinical documentation validation and proposes a structured hybrid framework specifically designed for MDS validation in SNF environments.

Methods:

A narrative review of peer-reviewed literature was conducted across PubMed, IEEE Xplore, and Scopus using the terms: artificial intelligence, machine learning, clinical documentation validation, electronic health records, skilled nursing facilities, and MDS assessment. A prototype simulation using 500 synthetic assessments with injected known errors was used to benchmark the proposed framework.

Results:

Existing AI approaches show complementary strengths: rule-based systems offer regulatory traceability while ML classifiers detect subtle non-deterministic patterns. The proposed five-layer framework integrates both paradigms. Prototype simulation results project F1-scores of 0.77 to 0.92 across key MDS sections, with highest performance in Activities of Daily Living scoring (0.92), special treatments (0.91), and ICD-10 diagnosis coding (0.88).

Conclusions:

The proposed framework addresses identified gaps in current MDS validation practice by providing real-time, 100%-coverage validation with automated regulatory versioning. Prospective multi-site evaluation is the essential next step. This work provides a structured blueprint for SNF technology implementers and clinical informatics researchers seeking to reduce documentation burden while improving reimbursement accuracy.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Bhimavarapu M

A Review and Proposed AI-Driven Framework for MDS Assessment Validation in Skilled Nursing Facilities

JMIR Preprints. 25/03/2026:96056

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.96056

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/96056

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.