Previously submitted to: JMIR Mental Health (no longer under consideration since Feb 07, 2026)
Date Submitted: Feb 7, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 7, 2026 - Feb 7, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Beyond Clinical Symptoms: A Psychosocial and Machine Learning Approach to Understanding Suicidal Ideation
ABSTRACT
Background:
Suicide is a major public mental health challenge, and many individuals experiencing suicidal ideation do not meet diagnostic criteria for psychiatric disorders or disclose symptoms during clinical encounters. This limits the effectiveness of symptom-based screening commonly used in mental health services.
Objective:
From an epidemiological and social psychiatry perspective, identifying psychosocial risk and protective factors beyond psychopathology is essential for population-level prevention and early intervention. This study examined whether suicidal ideation can be predicted using non-psychopathological psychological measures and identified socially and developmentally meaningful risk and resilience markers through explainable machine-learning models with external validation.
Methods:
Data were obtained from a mixed clinical and community-based sample of 190 adults. Suicidal ideation was defined using self-reported endorsement of suicide-related thoughts. Predictors consisted exclusively of validated non-pathological psychological measures relevant to social psychiatry and life-course epidemiology, including chronic and perceived stress, childhood adversity, personality traits, attachment styles, coping strategies, and emotion regulation capacities. Five supervised machine-learning algorithms were implemented using stratified five-fold cross-validation. To address demographic confounding and class imbalance, analyses were conducted on both the full dataset and a demographically matched subsample (n=110) balanced for age, sex, education, and income. Hyperparameter optimization targeted both area under the curve (AUC) and F1-score to ensure relevance for low-prevalence outcomes. Model generalizability was assessed using an independent external validation sample of university students (n=84). Model interpretability was examined using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).
Results:
Random Forest models showed the most robust and generalizable performance. In the matched sample, Bayesian-optimized models achieved an AUC of 0.878 and an F1-score of 0.819. External validation yielded an AUC of 0.791 and an F1-score of 0.549, representing a 2.4-fold improvement over chance-level prediction. Explainable analyses consistently identified perceived loneliness as the strongest predictor of suicidal ideation, followed by childhood emotional abuse, limited access to emotion regulation strategies, and low perceived self-efficacy. Higher conscientiousness and extraversion emerged as stable protective factors.
Conclusions:
Suicidal ideation can be predicted using psychosocial and developmental indicators independent of psychiatric symptom severity. These findings highlight loneliness and emotion regulation as key modifiable targets for population-level suicide prevention and identify personality-related resilience factors relevant for stratified risk assessment. Integrating such markers into mental health services and surveillance frameworks may enhance early identification beyond diagnostic approaches. Clinical Trial: -
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.