Previously submitted to: JMIR Cancer (no longer under consideration since Apr 22, 2026)
Date Submitted: Feb 11, 2026
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
EHealth Literacy in Patients with Urological Cancer: Cross-sectional Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Urological cancer patients are less likely to utilise psycho-oncological support services, possibly due to an inadequate provision of tailored support services. Digital media offer an alternative means of accessing medical information and services, highlighting the relevance of eHealth literacy.
Objective:
This study aims to identify predictors of higher eHealth literacy in patients with urogenital cancer.
Methods:
In this cross-sectional study 126 inpatients with urogenital cancer treated at the University Hospital of Düsseldorf were recruited. EHealth literacy was assessed using the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS). In addition, psychosocial distress (Distress Thermometer), anxiety (GAD-2), depression (PHQ-2) and sociodemographic and lifestyle factors were obtained. For statistical analysis Man-Whitney U tests, chi-square tests and hierarchical linear regression models were calculated.
Results:
The final regression model, including the dependent variables age, depression, gender and education, showed that patients with high eHealth literacy were significantly younger (p = .001), male (p = .008), more educated (p = .01) and less depressed (p = .02). Univariate analyses revealed significantly lower eHealth literacy among patients with psychosocial distress (p = .03), with no difference observed in terms of anxiety or smoking status.
Conclusions:
The results show that younger people and men in particular are associated with better eHealth literacy. Accordingly, older people as well as more psychosocially stressed and depressed patients need more support in using digital health services. Specific training measures and an intuitive, user-friendly digital design could narrow this gap in care.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.