Currently submitted to: JMIR Preprints
Date Submitted: Sep 30, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 30, 2025 - Sep 15, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Advancing Standardization and Interoperability of Disability-Related Data in Electronic Health Records: A Qualitative Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Approximately 27% of United States adults live with a disability, yet they face persistent disparities in health outcomes and access to care. The systematic collection of disability status and accommodation needs data in electronic health records (EHRs) can support more equitable access to care, help ensure that patients with disabilities receive appropriate, person-centered care, and bolster efforts to monitor and address health disparities for people with disabilities. However, data collection remains limited in the health care setting.
Objective:
This qualitative study aimed to examine current practices for collecting, documenting, and exchanging disability-related data in EHRs. This study identifies the current state of disability-related data collection by health care organizations; describes how these data are used by health care organizations and researchers; presents challenges to data collection; and offers opportunities to advance the standardized collection and use of disability-related data.
Methods:
A qualitative, two-pronged approach was employed, consisting of a literature scan and 13 key informant interviews with stakeholders from health systems, research institutions, and policymaking and advocacy organizations. Data were analyzed using a structured abstraction matrix to identify themes related to data collection practices, use cases, challenges, and opportunities to improve standardization and interoperability.
Results:
We identified three use cases for collecting, documenting, and exchanging disability-related data: (1) preparing for patient visits, (2) improving care quality, (3) facilitating care transitions, and (4) advancing equity research. However, findings from the literature scan and key informant interviews revealed that most health care organizations do not routinely collect disability status or accommodation needs data. Among those that do, they employ varied and non-standardized approaches, hindering the ability of health care organizations to provide legally mandated accommodations and deliver equitable, patient-centered care.
Conclusions:
Conclusions:
Standardized and systematic collection of disability status and accommodation needs data is critical to advancing health equity, improving care quality, and supporting patient-centered care for people with disabilities. The inclusion of “disability status” as a requirement for certified health information technology, including electronic health records (EHR), beginning in 2026 represents a critical step toward more standardized data collection. Efforts to strengthen data collection practices should include workflows for documenting a patient’s self-reported disability and requested accommodations, enhancing health information technology systems, engaging stakeholders across health care settings, and promoting adoption of national standards to ensure disability-related data are accurate, actionable, and interoperable.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.