Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Formative Research (no longer under consideration since Jan 09, 2026)

Date Submitted: Jul 25, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 29, 2025 - Sep 23, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Confounder Analysis and Visualization Treatment Pathways Associated to Amputation in patients with Diabetes Using Sankey Diagrams: Enhancing Explainability

  • rajashekar korutla; 
  • tanisha garg; 
  • marko milosevic; 
  • michael P. wilczek; 
  • afif nakhleh; 
  • Naim Shehadeh; 
  • Nawar Shara; 
  • Elsie G. Ross; 
  • Saeed Amal

ABSTRACT

Abstract: Background/Objectives: This study uses Sankey diagrams to analyze treatment pathways in patients with diabetes, focusing on amputation versus non-amputation outcomes. The study utilizes the All of Us dataset to investigate treatment patterns and their associations with amputation.

Methods:

Sankey diagrams visualized treatment sequences, displaying progression from initial treatments to subsequent therapies and outcomes. Logistic regression identified factors associated with amputation outcomes, calculating odds ratios to quantify relationships. Recognizing potential confounders, analyses were conducted by filtering patients into subgroups based on significant factors. Sankey diagrams were generated for statistically significant sub-cohorts to visualize treatment patterns.

Results:

In the All of Us dataset, metformin-based regimens were most common among patients without amputation, with metformin alone or combined with sulfonylureas and repaglinides predominating. Among patients who underwent amputation, GLP1 receptor agonist sequences were more frequent and showed significantly higher associations with amputation versus metformin (OR=4.53, 95% CI: 3.91-5.25, p<0.001; GLP1-insulin combination OR=8.38). Analysis identified significant amputation-associated factors: heart failure (OR=1.45), smoking (OR=1.63), male gender (OR=1.88), and Black race (OR=4.16, with 20.4% amputation rate vs 8.7% overall). Age-stratified analysis revealed patients aged 40-50 with amputation had 39.58% GLP1 agonist use versus 10.28% without amputation.

Conclusions:

Our observational findings demonstrate associations between treatment sequences and amputation outcomes, though causality cannot be established. Future research might incorporate machine learning models to predict amputation risk based on treatment sequences and patient factors, while accounting for treatment timing and duration, potentially enabling more personalized treatment approaches for at-risk diabetic patients.


 Citation

Please cite as:

korutla r, garg t, milosevic m, wilczek mP, nakhleh a, Shehadeh N, Shara N, Ross EG, Amal S

Confounder Analysis and Visualization Treatment Pathways Associated to Amputation in patients with Diabetes Using Sankey Diagrams: Enhancing Explainability

JMIR Preprints. 25/07/2025:81311

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.81311

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/81311

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.