Previously submitted to: JMIR mHealth and uHealth (no longer under consideration since Sep 05, 2025)
Date Submitted: Jul 12, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 17, 2025 - Sep 11, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Systematic review and meta-analysis wearable device artificial intelligence depression detection and depressive episode prediction performance
ABSTRACT
Background:
Depression is a globally prevalent psychiatric disorder, projected to become the leading cause of disease burden by 2030. Traditional diagnostic methods rely heavily on subjective assessments, lacking objective biomarkers and real-time monitoring capabilities. Recent advancements in wearable technology and artificial intelligence (AI) offer promising tools for depression detection and monitoring. However, the diagnostic accuracy of wearable-based AI algorithms remains variable and insufficiently evaluated.
Objective:
This study aims to systematically review and meta-analyze the diagnostic and predictive performance of wearable device–based AI models in detecting depression and predicting depressive episodes, and to identify key factors influencing diagnostic outcomes.
Methods:
Following PRISMA-DTA guidelines, a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO was conducted up to May 27, 2025. Eligible studies applied AI algorithms to data from wearable devices for depression detection or episode prediction. Data on diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio [DOR], area under the curve [AUC]) were extracted and analyzed using a bivariate random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using the PROBAST+AI tool, and evidence certainty was evaluated via GRADE.
Results:
Sixteen studies comprising 32 internal validation datasets were included, totaling 1,189 patients and 13,593 samples. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for depression detection were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.83–0.93) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.87–0.96), respectively. The pooled DOR was 110.47 (95% CI, 33.33–366.17), and the AUC was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94–0.98). Random forest algorithms demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance (sensitivity: 0.89; specificity: 0.91; AUC: 0.97). Subgroup analyses revealed that study design, AI method, reference standard, and data input type significantly influenced diagnostic outcomes (P < 0.05). For depressive episode prediction, based on 3 datasets, sensitivity was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.80–0.91) and specificity was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.59–0.71). The overall risk of bias was low to moderate, and no publication bias was detected.
Conclusions:
Wearable device–based AI models show high performance in detecting depression and moderate potential in predicting depressive episodes. However, substantial heterogeneity exists across studies, with predominant retrospective designs and reliance on public datasets limiting generalizability. Further large-scale, prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and standardize methodologies for clinical implementation.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.