Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Mental Health (no longer under consideration since Apr 10, 2025)

Date Submitted: Apr 10, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 10, 2025 - Apr 10, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

A Qualitative Exploration of Video-Based Motor Action Observation Perceptions in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain and Asymptomatic Participants: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis

  • Roy La Touche; 
  • José Vicente León-Hernández; 
  • Prado Silván-Ferrero; 
  • Encarnación Nouvilas-Pallejá; 
  • Alba Paris-Alemany; 
  • Miguel Ángel Sorrel; 
  • Joaquín Pardo-Montero

ABSTRACT

Background:

-

Objective:

This qualitative study explores the experiences and perceptions of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and asymptomatic participants as they observe exercise motor actions on videos accessed through social media, with an emphasis on identifying their interpretations, emotional responses, and potential differences between the groups.

Methods:

A cross-sectional qualitative approach using interpretative phenomenological analysis was employed to gain an in-depth understanding of individual experiences, following the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research criteria. The sample included 20 participants, 10 with CLBP and 10 asymptomatic, recruited from rehabilitation clinics and a university population.

Results:

Three main themes were identified: emotional and motivational impact, self-assessment of physical ability, and cognitive assessment of movement. Patients with CLBP reported fear of movement, concern about potential pain, and greater difficulty interpreting the exercises, which affected their motivation and perception of competence. In contrast, the asymptomatic participants showed confidence in their ability to perform the exercises and used the videos as a motivational tool. Both groups paid attention to technical details, although motivations differed: the patients with CLBP sought to minimize risks, whereas the asymptomatic patients sought to improve their performance.

Conclusions:

The results indicate that action observation might have divergent effects depending on the health status of the observer. For patients with CLBP, fear and difficulty interpreting observed actions limit their motivation. Future studies should consider the development of tailored interventions that address these barriers, improving the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs.


 Citation

Please cite as:

La Touche R, León-Hernández JV, Silván-Ferrero P, Nouvilas-Pallejá E, Paris-Alemany A, Sorrel M, Pardo-Montero J

A Qualitative Exploration of Video-Based Motor Action Observation Perceptions in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain and Asymptomatic Participants: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis

JMIR Preprints. 10/04/2025:75772

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.75772

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/75772

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.