Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Medical Education (no longer under consideration since Feb 11, 2025)

Date Submitted: Dec 5, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 6, 2024 - Jan 31, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Effectiveness of VR and Traditional Training in Medical Education for Mass Casualty Management: An OSCE Evaluation

  • Li Zhe; 
  • Lyu Liwen; 
  • Chen Wan; 
  • Qiu Guozheng; 
  • Shi Lei; 
  • Tang Yutao; 
  • Xu Xibin; 
  • Zhu Sanshan

ABSTRACT

Background:

Effective training in mass casualty incidents (MCIs) is crucial for medical students, particularly in scenarios such as road traffic accidents. Traditional lecture-based training is common, while VR offers immersive and potentially superior learning. This study evaluates VR-based training against traditional methods to determine which approach better enhances both theoretical knowledge and practical skills in MCI management.

Objective:

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of VR-based training compared to traditional lecture-based training for medical students in managing MCIs, specifically focusing on road traffic accidents. The primary assessment was performed using an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) and a theoretical knowledge test

Methods:

A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 46 medical students receiving emergency medicine training. Participants were randomly assigned to either a VR group or a traditional lecture group, with each group receiving a 2-hour training session on mass casualty management. The training effectiveness was evaluated through pre- and post-training knowledge tests, OSCE performance, and post-training feedback questionnaires. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the two groups

Results:

Baseline characteristics were well-matched between groups. The VR group demonstrated significantly higher post-test scores (83.96 ± 13.11) compared to the traditional group (72.17 ± 20.89, p = 0.03). The learning gain was also significantly greater in the VR group (40.26 ± 15.61) compared to the traditional group (28.26 ± 17.04, p = 0.02). OSCE results showed the VR group consistently outperformed the traditional group across all stations, with significant improvements in triage, injury assessment, and overall scene management. Additionally, feedback from the post-training questionnaire revealed that the VR group reported greater confidence in performing critical tasks

Conclusions:

VR-based training offers a more effective and engaging approach for teaching mass casualty management compared to traditional methods. It enhances both theoretical knowledge and practical skills, helping to better prepare students for high-pressure scenarios such as MCIs. As VR technology continues to evolve, its integration into medical education holds strong potential for improving preparedness and clinical performance in emergency settings


 Citation

Please cite as:

Zhe L, Liwen L, Wan C, Guozheng Q, Lei S, Yutao T, Xibin X, Sanshan Z

Effectiveness of VR and Traditional Training in Medical Education for Mass Casualty Management: An OSCE Evaluation

JMIR Preprints. 05/12/2024:69690

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.69690

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/69690

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.