Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Formative Research (no longer under consideration since Nov 21, 2025)

Date Submitted: Aug 20, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 23, 2024 - Oct 18, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Face-to-Face Weight Management Intervention in Maidstone, United Kingdom: A Real-World Evaluation

  • Charlotte Summers; 
  • Alisdair Taylor; 
  • Arjun Panesar; 
  • Amit Kaura

ABSTRACT

Background:

Obesity remains a critical global public health issue, contributing to severe health conditions such as type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. In Maidstone, United Kingdom the obesity rate stands at 16.3% higher than the national average of 15.8%.

Objective:

This study evaluates the demographics and outcomes of a face-to-face weight management program implemented in Maidstone, a region with varying levels of deprivation, who self-referred to a Tier 2 Weight Management program.

Methods:

This study employed a single-arm intervention design, where adults who were overweight or obese self-referred to an in-person weight management service. The service focuses on accessible behavior change self-management through weekly evidence-based structured education, guided behavioral change activities, and community support. Participant characteristics and health data were collected at baseline, 12 and 26-weeks.

Results:

A total of 50 participants self-referred and completed the initial registration process, all of whom (100%) were deemed eligible for the program. The first 40 participants (80%) enrolled in the face-to-face weight management service, and of these, 15 (38%) also downloaded an app for additional support. The average age of participants was 42.4 years, with mean BMI of 35.7 kg/m², predominantly female (68%) and 73% identified as white. At the 26-week follow-up, 75% of participants reported outcomes, with an average weight loss of 3.46% ± 4.2% (from 98.3 ± 23.0 kg at Week 0 to 94.9 ± 21.7 kg at Week 26) and an average BMI reduction of 3.34% ± 3.9 kg/m² (from 35.7 ± 8.7 kg/m² at Week 0 to 34.5 ± 8.3 kg/m² at Week 26). Participants expressed high levels of engagement and acceptance of the service, and those who utilized the digital app experienced greater weight loss.

Conclusions:

The face-to-face service was well-received and facilitated significant weight loss. Integration of digital technology contributed to greater weight reduction among participants.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Summers C, Taylor A, Panesar A, Kaura A

Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Face-to-Face Weight Management Intervention in Maidstone, United Kingdom: A Real-World Evaluation

JMIR Preprints. 20/08/2024:65607

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.65607

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/65607

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.