Previously submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research (no longer under consideration since Jun 06, 2025)
Date Submitted: Jul 16, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 17, 2024 - Sep 11, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Use large language models (LLMs) tools for supporting qualitative research: A phenomenological study of Chinese clinical researchers’ experiences and perceptions
ABSTRACT
Background:
The integration of large language models (LLMs) into qualitative research has shown promise in enhancing analytical depth and efficiency. However, there remains a substantial gap in empirical evidence regarding how clinical researchers, particularly in China, utilize these technologies in real-world settings.
Objective:
This study aimed to explore the firsthand experiences, perceptions, and challenges of Chinese clinical researchers using LLMs in qualitative research, identify significant ethical dilemmas and practical issues, and inform future research, policy-making, and educational initiatives.
Methods:
We conducted a qualitative phenomenological study using semi-structured interviews with researchers from two major tertiary hospitals in Southwest China. Ten Participants were interviewed to solicit their experiences and perceptions regarding using various LLM tools in qualitative research. Colaizzi’s analytic method was employed for thematic analysis of the interview transcripts.
Results:
The study identified three key themes: (1) LLMs were extensively used across different stages of research, particularly in manuscript writing, data analysis, and interpretation of results; 2) Researchers experience an emotional transition from initial excitement to a more critical appreciation of the strengths and limitations of LLMs, leading to a more rational understanding of AI’s role and application in research; 3) Ethical concerns and the need for skill development in effectively using AI tools are prominent, calling for specialized training.
Conclusions:
LLM tools are pivotal assets in supporting qualitative research among Chinese clinical researchers, offering significant advantages in handling complex data and improving research efficiency. However, the integration of these tools into clinical research practices also raises important ethical questions and necessitates a comprehensive approach to training. Guidelines and educational programs are needed to enhance the ethical and effective use of AI in research to ensure these technologies augment rather than compromise the integrity of scientific research.
Citation
The author of this paper has made a PDF available, but requires the user to login, or create an account.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.