Previously submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research (no longer under consideration since Sep 03, 2024)
Date Submitted: Mar 25, 2024
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Digital nursing quality management: an evolutionary concept analysis
ABSTRACT
Background:
Rapid advances in digital technology and its increasing integration into healthcare create an opportunity to leverage these innovations to improve nursing quality management.
Objective:
This paper aims to report the results of an evolutionary concept analysis of Digital Nursing Quality Management (DNQM).
Methods:
The Rodgers evolutionary method of concept analysis was used to examine the attributes, antecedents, consequences, and related concepts of DNQM.
Results:
DNQM is a strategic management approach that systematically uses evolving digital technology to achieve optimal nursing quality, guided by the timeless principle of humanistic care. The defining attributes are human-machine collaboration, interactive empowerment, and a digital ecosystem.
Conclusions:
DNQM is not a mere amalgamation of separate components but a dynamic ecosystem shaped by individual, organizational, and technological factors. Clinical Trial: Not applicable.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.