Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research (no longer under consideration since Apr 08, 2024)

Date Submitted: Nov 10, 2023

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

The WebRA study: Implementation perspectives of using a digital patient education programme in clinical practice

  • Line Raunsbæk Knudsen; 
  • Kirsten Lomborg; 
  • Ellen-Margrethe Hauge; 
  • Annette de Thurah

ABSTRACT

Background:

The integration of telehealth interventions into clinical practice is frequently delayed, hindering the full adoption. Previously, we developed a digital patient education programme for self-management in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). While the programme design considered crucial factors to ensure the likelihood of success in clinical practice, there is a need for a thorough and systematic evaluation of implementation perspectives.

Objective:

To explore perspectives of implementation in using a digital patient education programme in clinical practice.

Methods:

The non-adoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread and sustainability (NASSS) framework was used to evaluate the successes and challenges of implementing the digital patient education programme. We included a data set consisting of qualitative focus group discussions involving study nurses, rheumatologists, and leaders from rheumatology departments. Data analysis was guided by a deductive content analysis approach. Further we included data from earlier studies pertaining to the programme's implementation, comprising the programme development process, a randomized controlled trial evaluating the programme's effectiveness, and a qualitative study exploring patients' perspectives of the programme.

Results:

Facilitators and challenges of importance to implementation of digital PE were identified. While a wide range of patients could benefit from using digital PE, future implementation should aim for an even broader group than those studied. Both patients and healthcare providers embraced the technology, and the fact that it did not require specific technical skills enhances its potential for success. However, offering digital PE should be based on individual assessments, and expanding its use will require organizational adjustments. An adaptable structure is needed to accommodate unforeseen care needs that may arise following the use of digital PE at home. There was indication of some reluctance among healthcare providers toward the programme shown by concerns about changing roles, which could impact the adoption of the program.

Conclusions:

The design and ease of use of the technology, the program's effectiveness, its availability, and the potential to release healthcare resources may encourage the implementation of digital patient education. Challenges associated with implementing this mode of care pertains to the illness and the patient population, user adoption of the technology, and the organization of patient education. Clinical Trial: N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

Raunsbæk Knudsen L, Lomborg K, Hauge EM, de Thurah A

The WebRA study: Implementation perspectives of using a digital patient education programme in clinical practice

JMIR Preprints. 10/11/2023:54471

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.54471

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/54471

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.