Previously submitted to: JMIR Formative Research (no longer under consideration since Jul 08, 2025)
Date Submitted: Nov 10, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 9, 2023 - Jan 22, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Participatory Action Research Methodology to Co-Create Cho!ces: An Interactive Game to Raise Awareness about Sexual Assault Bystander Intervention among Youth
ABSTRACT
Background:
Youth sexual assault and sexual abuse are particularly troubling with implications for public health, mental health, educational outcomes, the need for criminal justice intervention, and the likelihood of revictimization or perpetration. Despite receiving increased attention, the problem continues to exist with no clear sign of diminishing. In this regard, serious games create spaces of simulated interactions where people can practice behaviors without exposing themselves to risk in a supportive learning environment. At the same time, bystander interventions can contribute to promoting positive social norms, promoting empowerment, and providing support to victims.
Objective:
The goal is to promote bystander intervention to safely identify, report, and deter sexual violence.
Methods:
A total of 10 youths (aged 16-22 with parental consent for minors) attended 10 sessions over the course of 6 months for the development of the game. Youth and community partners were responsible for creating the rules of the game, selecting a name, developing the board game, and completing preliminary testing with youth in the targeted community.
Results:
The participants completed a pre- and post-game test to give feedback on the game. The majority (91%) of the participants increased their knowledge of how to report sexual violence from the bystander perspective. All these increases were maintained at the 30-day follow-up review. Overall, participants perceived that Cho!ces’ instructions were easy to follow, agreed that the facilitator established rapport, and that Cho!ces encouraged people to talk more about how to intervene when witnessing a sexual violence incident
Conclusions:
The pilot test results confirmed that players gained knowledge of sexual violence. The results indicated that the game generated a positive outcome and increased the likelihood of adoption of behaviors. Also, involving communities made the game more representative and inclusive and allowed for the development of lasting partnerships. Youth were asked about the 3 most important things they learned in this process. From their responses, the most recurrent learning topics included how to start a discussion about difficult topics, the importance of being open, and how to deliberate about sexual violence situations. They also learned about what it means to be a bystander. Clinical Trial: Not applicable
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.