Previously submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research (no longer under consideration since Jul 15, 2024)
Date Submitted: Jul 12, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 12, 2023 - Sep 6, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Store-and-forward teledermatology based on photographs taken with a smartphone by a general practitioner in case of suspicion of melanoma: evaluation of inter- and intra-rater concordance
ABSTRACT
Background:
The incidence of melanoma is increasing worldwide. The effectiveness of treatment is associated with diagnostic and therapeutic delays. In this context, teledermatology (TD), especially store-and-forward TD, is a promising technology, as it can accelerate the care process. However, several studies have indicated that the efficiency and reliability of this practice in cases of pigmented skin lesions is not proven and have called for further work.
Objective:
The main objective of this study was to evaluate inter- and intra-rater management concordance among teledermatologists concerning the appropriate consultation delay when reviewing photographs of suspicious pigmented skin lesions taken with a smartphone by a general practitioner (GP).
Methods:
We first analyzed management concordance among different teledermatologists with experience in TD in 2020. The teledermatologists determined the consultation delay to propose to 110 patients with suspicious pigmented skin lesions viewed online based on 241 photographs taken by GPs in a real-life context. The practitioners had to decide among 4 possibilities for care management: 1. urgent need for consultation (15 days), 2. non-urgent need for consultation, 3. no need for consultation ("simple letter to the attending physician"), and 4. impossible to assess: request for additional information or photographs from the GP. "Major" discordance was defined as follows: one teledermatologist decided that the patient needed a consultation within 15 days, while another teledermatologist decided that it was not necessary to see the patient. We performed the same analysis two years after to evaluate the intra-rater concordance.
Results:
This study revealed poor agreement among dermatologists when they assessed photographs taken by a GP using a smartphone. The interrater agreement was poor regardless of the analytical modality used. The 2-to-2 interdermatologist management concordance revealed a low Cohen's kappa (between 0.11 and 0.43). Overall agreement was low (Fleiss’ kappa 0.24 in 2020 et 0.27 in 2022). We observed major discordance regarding care management for 38% of the patients in 2020 and 25% of the patients in 2022. Those results of interrater agreement were confirmed by the second analysis in 2022. The intra-rater concordance was poor also with low Cohen's kappa indices (between 0.37 and 0.46).
Conclusions:
The poor inter- and intra-rater agreement calls into question the relevance of the store and forward dermatology, without the use of dermoscopy, for suspicious pigmented lesions. This study is in line with recent studies calling for postponement of the development of store-and-forward TD for the management of suspicious pigmented skin lesions until additional studies have been carried out.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.