Previously submitted to: JMIR Serious Games (no longer under consideration since Sep 18, 2023)
Date Submitted: Apr 25, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 25, 2023 - Jun 20, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
In my future shoes: using VR decision support tools in moral and practical prenatal decisions for an enriched and less biased simulation of one’s future self
ABSTRACT
Background:
An expectant mother faces several decisions related to pregnancy that cannot be tackled with the rational choice method or by consulting medical evidence. These choices are moral and practical prenatal decisions, which involve respectively the prospective mother’s moral and practical identities. Current genetic counselling services do not support expectant mothers in such decisions, and the mental processes employed, such as mental simulation, are prone to decision-making biases that increase the likelihood of making sub-optimal decisions.
Objective:
We show how the quality of moral and practical prenatal decisions can be improved using virtual reality (VR) and provide practical recommendations for the design and development of an effective and ethically aligned VR tool for such prenatal decisions.
Methods:
This is a theoretical study on moral and practical decisions in pregnancy, which adopts the logical-conceptual method of philosophy.
Results:
VR technology is a suitable decision-support tool for making moral and practical prenatal decisions. Yet, to be effective and ethically aligned, VR should comply to a set of practical recommendations for its design and development that we provide.
Conclusions:
VR allows the operationalization of biopsychosocial support in the clinical encounter, facilitates the individual’s reflection on her values and beliefs, supports the contextualization of available choices to an individual’s circumstance, presents complex information in more understandable forms, and enhances the ability of mental simulation. An effective VR tool facilitating decision-making in moral and practical prenatal decisions should consider the specific needs of its target audience and be built in consultation with the relevant stakeholders and experts in the field (e.g., social workers, therapists, clinicians). Moreover, VR scenarios that are part of this tool should be community specific, presented in an emotionally balanced manner, and based in reality. Finally, VR tools should be distributed as part of a public health program for reasons of fairness. This study provides the theoretical basis and framework for the development of a better consulting support in pregnancy and contributes to a more inclusive patient engagement in prenatal decision-making, which has been advocated for in contemporary medical practice. Clinical Trial: Not applicable
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.