Previously submitted to: JMIR Medical Education (no longer under consideration since Feb 16, 2025)
Date Submitted: Apr 14, 2023
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
How healthcare providers find information regarding benefits and harms of treatments at an independent academic center: a cross-sectional study
ABSTRACT
Background:
The information-seeking behavior of physicians to cater to the patient's information needs is not comprehensively studied.
Objective:
Our cross-sectional study's key goals were to understand providers' information-seeking behavior regarding answering patients' specific questions about treatments' benefits and harms.
Methods:
Using an interview guide, we collected pertinent data from structured one-on-one interviews.
Results:
119 providers from eight departments participated. The majority, 62% (77/124), reported that patients brought information about treatment and 56% (69/124) about a diagnosis. 72%(89/124) reported using DynaMed, UptoDate, Lexicomp, and 54%(67/124) used Pubmed. 27%(33/124) referenced the clinical practice guidelines, 17% (21/124) referred to textbooks, and 15% (19/124) discussed with colleagues. 35%(44/124) reported conducting traditional critical appraisals to determine information's credibility.
Conclusions:
We found that most physicians across all medical specialties used and preferred point-of-care tools such as DynaMed and UptoDate. However, many providers still rely on the reputation of the information source, such as a journal impact factor and the author's research credentials, to determine the credibility and reliability of the information. We believe healthcare providers need to take a more active role in guiding patients to credible, evidence-based sources of health information. Physicians need to use traditional critical appraisal tools to determine information credibility.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.